مدل‌سازی گسلش نرمال و تونل قطعه‌ای در سانتریفیوژ ژئوتکنیکی

نوع مقاله : Articles

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تبریز

2 دانشکده مهندسی عمران، پردیس دانشکده های فنی دانشگاه تهران

3 دانشکده عمران دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

روش حفاری تمام مکانیزه‌ی تونل، لاینینگ‌های سگمنتی را ترویج نموده است. یکی از انواع تغییر شکل‌های بزرگ و ماندگار زمین، گسلش است. تونل‌ها به جهت طول زیاد در معرض خطر گسلش هستند. رفتار تونل‌ها در ناحیه‌ی گسل یکی از مسائلی است که کمتر مطالعه شده است. در این مقاله، جزئیات روش مدل‌سازی گسلش زمین و تونل سگمنتی حفر شده در خاک در سانتریفیوژ ژئوتکنیکی بیان ‌شده و نتایج شش آزمایش گسلش شیب‌لغز نرمال با تونل سگمنتی در سانتریفیوژ ژئوتکنیکی ارائه گردیده است. نتایج بیانگر موفقیت در مدل‌سازی است؛ لذا مکانیسم‌های گسیختگی ممکن مشخص گردید. این مکانیسم‌ها تابع میزان جابه‌جایی گسل است. با افزایش جابه‌جایی در گسل، تغییر شکل در مقطع عرضی تونل و در نهایت گسیختگی در پوشش تونل و ریزش خاک داخل آن اتفاق می‌افتد. نظر به اینکه تونل-های مورد مطالعه تونل‌های کم‌عمق شهری لحاظ گردیده‌اند، لذا ریزش خاک به داخل تونل منجر به شکل‌گیری فروچاله در سطح زمین می-شود. نتایج آزمایش‌ها با سربارهای مختلف نشان داد که با افزایش سربار تونل، آستانه‌ی تحمل تونل در مقابل ریزش خاک به داخل تونل در اثر گسلش افزایش می‌یابد. با وجود اعمال گسلش زیاد، آسیب‌های سازه‌ای در سگمنت‌ها به دلیل عملکرد مناسب هندسی سگمنت‌ها و اتصالات آنها اندک بوده و تنها آسیب‌هایی موضعی در آنها مشاهده گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Modelling of Dip-Slip Normal Fault Rupture and Segmental Shallow Tunnel in Geotechnical Centrifuge

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Kiani 1
  • Abbass Ghalandarzadeh 2
  • Tohid Akhlaghi 3
1 Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Iran
2 Faculty of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran
3 Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

The use of urban tunnels is increasing to accommodate lifelines such as roads, railroads, subways, sewer systems and high-voltage electrical cables. Many cities sit on sedimentary deposits and faulting zones, which presents challenges for the construction of these tunnels. One type of probable damage is that caused by permanent ground displacement (PGD). Severe earthquakes can cause such displacements to appear at the ground surface and cause fractures called surface faulting. The interaction of surface faulting at ground structures such as bridges, dams, and buildings or underground structures such as tunnels and pipelines can result in major damage to them. Comprehensive studies have been conducted to fully understand this phenomenon [1-11].
 The building codes of many countries recommend avoiding construction in the vicinity of active faults, but at times the construction of a tunnel intersecting a fault is inevitable [4]. It is not always possible to avoid the construction of a tunnel near an active fault. Tunnels are at the risk of faulting due to their long length. This can affect the design of the tunnel lining. Such a tunnel must be capable of resisting fault displacement so that it will suffer only minor damage.
When designing tunnels located in the areas with the potential for surface fault rupture, it is necessary to consider the effects of loads caused by fault rupture in addition to other types of seismic loads [12]. Researchers have developed specific criteria to account for the effect of seismic wave loading. However, the effect of fault rupture loads has not been considered in comprehensive design methods.
Highly active faults can cause significant damage to a tunnel. Fault displacement can produce extreme stresses on the lining of the tunnel. The study of tunnel behavior passing through a fault zone during an earthquake is practically unknown because it has been experienced less study and investigations. Physical modeling by the use of geotechnical centrifuge provides the possibility of investigating the up-mentioned geotechnical phenomenon.
The current study investigated the effects of normal faulting on shallow segmental tunnels using physical modeling in a geotechnical centrifuge. This article describes the details of physical modeling of a normal fault, a segmental tunnel in a centrifuge, and the results of six centrifuge tests.
One of the most important and applicable results obtained from the faulting tests is an understanding of the failure modes. It was possible to discern vulnerable areas in the segmental tunnels by determining the failure modes and designing methods to mitigate tunnel damage. The present study conducted a series of centrifuge model tests on segmental tunnels subjected to normal faulting. Results indicate the probable rupture mechanisms. Results show that segmental tunnels can tolerate superficial faulting. However, as the faulting displacement increases, oval shapes in segmental ring occur in the faulting zone and finally tunnel collapse happen. However, the results indicated the absence of sudden collapse of segmental tunnels under normal faulting and improvement of function in response to an increase in the overburden of the tunnel. The angle of the fault affected tunnel behavior. Despite large displacement faulting, structural damage to the segments was very low because of the adequate geometric functioning of the segments and their joints. The length of the zone affected by faulting in the tunnel decreased as the overburden increased, but the severity of damage increased in response to localization of fault displacement. Sinkhole formation upon the collapse of soil into the tunnel is likely at the ground surface. Special attention must be paid to the effect of sinkholes on ground structures in the vicinity of the tunnel.
The results of this paper can be used to determine the pattern of rupture where a tunnel intersects a fault. Obviously, the pattern derived from this modeling can play an important role in developing analytical analysis and numerical methods.
The results can be used for better understanding of segmental tunnel behavior where it intersects a fault zone; it can also be used to specify the locations affected by the faulting and to adopt preventive strategies as well.
References

Bray, J., Seed, R., Ciuff, L., and Seed, H. (1994) Earthquake fault rupture propagation through soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(3), 543-561.
Pamuk, A., Kalkan, E., and Ling, H. (2005) Structural and geotechnical impacts of surface rupture on highway structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 581-589.
Konagai, K., Hori, M. (2006) Key Points for Rational Design for Civil-Infrastructures near Seismic Faults Reflecting Soil-Structure Interaction Features. Report of JSPS research project.
Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, M.G., Bransby, M.F., Davies, M.C.R, and El Nahas, A. (2007) Fault rupture propagation through sand: finite-element analysis and validation through centrifuge experiments. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(8), 943-958.
Lin, M., Chung, C., Jeng, F. and Yao, T. (2007) The deformation of overburden soil induced by thrust faulting and its impact on underground tunnels. Engineering Geology, 92(3-4), 110-132.
Ng, C.W.W., Cai, Q.P., and Hu, P. (2012) Centrifuge and numerical modeling of normal fault-rupture propagation in clay with and without a preexisting fracture. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(12), 1492-1502.
Oettle, N. and Bray, J. (2013) Fault rupture propagation through previously ruptured soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(10), 1637-1647.
Fadaee, M., Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, G., Jafari, M., and Kamalian, M. (2013) Soil bentonite wall protects foundation from thrust faulting: analyses and experiment. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 12(3), 473-486.
Rojhani, M., Moradi, M., Galandarzadeh, A., and Takada, S. (2012) Centrifuge modeling of buried continuous pipelines subjected to reverse faulting. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 49(6), 659-670.

10. Moosavi, S.M., Jafari, M.K., Kamalian, M. and Shafiee, A. (2010) Experimental investigation of reverse fault rupture–rigid shallow foundation interaction. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(2), 85-98.
11.Kiani, M., Akhlaghi, T. and Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2016) Experimental modeling of segmental shallow tunnels  in alluvial affected by normal faults. Journal of Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 51, 108-119.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Segmental Tunnel
  • Normal Fault Rupture
  • Geotechnical Centrifuge
  • Physical Modeling
  1. Loukidis, D., Bouckovalas, G., and Papadimitriou, A. (2009) Analysis of fault rupture propagation through uniform soil cover. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 1389-1404.
  2. Anastasopoulos, I. and Gazetas, G. (2007) Foundation–structure systems over a rupturing normal fault: Part I. Observations after the Kocaeli 1999 earthquake. Bull. Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), 253-275.
  3. Kiani, M., Ghalandarzadeh, A., and Akhlaghi, T. (2013) Physical modelling of segmental tunnel interaction with 60˚ normal fault in geotechnical centrifuge. 10th Iranian Tunelling Conference, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Hashash, Y.M.A., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B., and Yao, J.I.C. (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 16(4), 247-293.
  5. Sugimura, Y. Miura, S., and Konagai, K. (2001) Damage to shihkang dam inflicted by faulting in the september 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. In Seismic Fault Induced Failures.
  6. Wang, W.L., Wang, T.T., Su, J.J., Lin, C.H., Seng, C.R., and Huang, T.H. (2001) Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 16(3), 133-150.
  7. Konagai, K. and Hori, M. (2006) Key Points for Rational Design for Civil-Infrastructures near Seismic Faults Reflecting Soil-Structure Interaction Features. Report of JSPS Research Project.
  8. Prentice, C. and Ponti, D. (1997) Coseismic deformation of the Wrights tunnel during the 1906 San Francisco earthquake: A key to understanding 1906 fault slip and 1989 surface ruptures in the southern Santa Cruz Mountains, California. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(B1), 635-648.
  9. Kontogianni, V. and Stiros, S. (2003) Earthquakes and seismic faulting: effects on tunnels. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 12, 153-156.
  10. Bäckblom, G., Munier, G., and Hökmark, H. (2004) Earthquake data and modelling to study the effects of future earthquakes on a final repository of spent nuclear fuel in sweden. World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
  11. Wang, Z.Z., Gao, B., Jiang, Y., and Yuan, S. (2009) Investigation and assessment on mountain tunnels and geotechnical damage after the Wenchuan earthquake. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52(2), 546-558.
  12. Kiani, M., Akhlaghi, T., and Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2016) Experimental modeling of segmental shallow tunnels in alluvial affected by normal faults. Journal of Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 51, 108-116.
  13. Moosavi, S.M., Jafari, M.K., Kamalian, M., and Shafiee, A. (2010) Experimental investigation of reverse fault rupture–rigid shallow foundation interaction. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(2), 85-98.
  14. Bray, J., Seed, R., Ciuff, L., and Seed, H. (1994) Earthquake fault rupture propagation through soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(3), 543-561.
  15. Pamuk, A., Kalkan, E., and Ling, H. (2005) Structural and geotechnical impacts of surface rupture on highway structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 581-589.
  16. Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, M.G., Bransby, M.F., Davies, M.C.R., and Nahas, A.El. (2007) Fault rupture propagation through sand: finite-element. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.
  17. Lin, M., Chung, C., and Jeng, F. (2006) Deformation of overburden soil induced by thrust fault slip. Engineering Geology, 88, 70-89.
  18. Ng, C.W.W., Cai, Q.P., and Hu, P. (2012) Centrifuge and numerical modeling of normal fault-rupture propagation in clay with and without a preexisting fracture. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(12), 1492-1502.
  19. Oettle, N. and Bray, J. (2013) Fault rupture propagation through previously ruptured soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(10), 1637-1647.
  20. Anastasopoulos, I., Callerio, A., Bransby, M.F., Davies, M.C.R., Nahas, A.EI., Faccioli, E., Gazetas, G., Masella, A., Paolucci, R., Pecker, A., and Rossignol, E. (2008) Numerical analyses of fault–foundation interaction, Bull. Earthquake Eng.
  21. Anastasopoulos, I. and Gazetas, G. (2007) Foundation–structure systems over a rupturing normal fault: Part II. Analysis of the Kocaeli case histories. Bull Earthquake Engineering, (5), 277-301.
  22. Bransby, M.F., Davies, M.C.R. and Nahas, A.EL. (2008) Centrifuge modelling of normal fault–foundation interaction. Bull. Earthquake Engineering, (6), 585-605.
  23. Bransby, M.F., Davies, M.C.R., Nahas, A.EL., and Nagaoka, S. (2008) Centrifuge modelling of reverse fault–foundation interaction. Bull. Earthquake Engineering, (6), 607-628.
  24. Gazetas, G., Pecker, A., Faccioli, E., Paolucci, R. and Anastasopoulos, I. (2008) Preliminary design recommendations for dip-slip fault–foundation interaction. Bull. Earthquake Engineering.
  25. Fadaee, M., Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, G., Jafari, M., and Kamalian, M. (2013) Soil bentonite wall protects foundation from thrust faulting: analyses and experiment. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, (12), 473-486.
  26. Rojhani, M., Moradi, M., Galandarzadeh, A., and Takada, S. (2012) Centrifuge modeling of buried continuous pipelines subjected to reverse faulting. Canadian Geotechcal Journal, 49, 659-670.
  27. Burridge, P., Scott, R., and Hall, J. (1989) Centrifuge study of faulting effect on tunnel. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 115(10), 949-967.
  28. Caulfield, R., Kieffer, D., Tsztoo, D., and Cain, B. (2005) Seismic design measures for the retrofit of the claremont tunnel. In RETC Proceedings.
  29. Johansson, J. and Konagai, K. (2006) Fault induced permanent ground deformations-an experimental comparison of wet and dry soil and implications for buried structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26, 45-53.
  30. Lin, M., Chung, C., Jeng, F., and Yao, T. (2007) The deformation of overburden soil induced by thrust faulting and its impact on underground tunnels. Engineering Geology.
  31. Gregor, T., Garrod, B., and Young, D. (2007) Analyses of underground structures crossing an active fault in Coronado, California. In Underground Space – the 4th Dimension of Metropolises.
  32. Anastasopoulos, I., Gerolymos, N., Drosos, V., Georgarakos, T., Kourkoulis, R., and Gazetas, G. (2008) Behaviour of deep immersed tunnel under combined normal fault rupture deformation and subsequent seismic shaking. Bull. Earthquake Engineering.
  33. Anastasopoulos, I. and Gazetas, G.(2010) Analysis of cut-and-cover tunnels against large tectonic. Bull. Earthquake Engineering, (8), 283-307.
  34. Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., and Gao, B. (2012) The seismic behavior of the tunnel across active fault. in WCEE2012.
  35. Baziar, M., Nabizadeh, A., Lee, C., and Hung, W. (2014) Centrifuge modeling of interaction between reverse faulting and tunnel. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 65, 151-164.
  36. Muir Wood, D. (2004) Geotechnical Modelling. Spon Press, London.