بررسی اثر فرکانس بارگذاری بر نشست و ظرفیت باربری خاک دانه‌ای مسلح به ژئوگرید

نوع مقاله : Articles

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، گروه مهندسی عمران، تهران، ایران

2 گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران

چکیده

در پژوهش حاضر، با هدف مطالعه تأثیر فرکانس بر نشست و باربری خاک دانه­ای مسلح به ژئوگرید، سیستم آزمایشگاهی جدیدی طراحی و ساخته شده که قادر به انجام آزمایش بارگذاری صفحه به‌صورت استاتیکی و تناوبی و اندازه‌گیری پارامترهایی نظیر نیروی وارد به صفحه، نشست صفحه بارگذاری، فشار زیر صفحه بارگذاری و کرنش محوری ژئوگرید باشد. سپس توده خاک با روش بارش ماسه آماده شده و با تک‌لایه ژئوگرید در موقعیت بهینه مسلح شده است. در نهایت، یک آزمایش بارگذاری صفحه استاتیکی و سه آزمایش بارگذاری صفحه تناوبی با فرکانس‌های 1، 2 و 4 هرتز صورت گرفته است و با مقایسه نتایج مشخص شده که با افزایش فرکانس بارگذاری و نزدیک شدن مقدار آن به فرکانس طبیعی سیستم، نشست تناوبی افزایش می‌یابد ولی تأثیر آن به دلیل افزایش تراکم خاک به‌تدریج کاهش می‌یابد. همچنین، بارگذاری تناوبی باعث ایجاد نشست‌های ماندگار در توده خاک شده و مسلح‌سازی خاک نتوانسته مانع وقوع چنین نشست‌هایی حتی بعد از هزار چرخه بارگذاری شود. بارگذاری تناوبی باعث افزایش تراکم و در نتیجه افزایش ظرفیت باربری نسبت به حالت استاتیکی می‌شود ولی تغییرات فرکانس تأثیری بر ظرفیت باربری پس تناوبی ندارد. ضمن اینکه فرکانس بارگذاری تأثیری بر توزیع فشار زیر شالوده و کرنش لایه ژئوگرید نیز نداشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Loading Frequency on the Settlement and Bearing Capacity of the Footing over the Soil Reinforced by One Geogrid Layer

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdolah Tabaroei 1
  • Saeed Abrishami 2
  • Ehsan Seyedi Hosseininia 2
  • Navid Ganjian 1
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

The soil under footings is generally under cyclic loading, which causes that the footing operation becomes different from that in static loading condition. The change in the behavior corresponds to the bearing capacity and the settlement of the footing under cyclic loading. To compensate such limitations, it is common practice to improve the soil behavior by considering reinforcementlayers in depths under the footing region. By this approach, the reinforcement layers, which are able to resist tensile loads, decrease the soil settlements and consequently, cause to increase the tolerable applied pressure with respect to the condition where the soil is not reinforced with such layers. In the literature, there are several researches that studied and compared the behavior of non-reinforced and reinforced soils under both static and cyclic loads. It is noted that most of these studies were performed by considering small dimensions of footings by using dimensional analysis. Furthermore, all previous studies have only focused on the post-cyclic settlement of the footings and no investigation was done on the effectiveness of the bearing capacity or applied load under the footing. In the present study, the mechanical behavior of a footing under static and cyclic loading condition is investigated by paying attention to both the settlement and bearing capacity. It is also aimed to find the effect of loading frequency on the footing behavior. In order to have more effective results to be used as practice, experimental tests were performed by using an equipped plate load test (PLT) system. The diameter of the circular plate is 300 mm that is equal to traditional PLT equipment in common practice. The plate was thick to behave rigidly and it is equipped with monitoring system including LVDTs, load cells, pressure gauges and strain gauges installed in different parts of the plate. The test were done in a reservoir with diameter of 1400 mm and height of 900 mm. The soil inside the reservoir was uniform-graded sand whose relative density was 72%. In order to assure having a uniform-compacted soil in the whole reservoir, a portable curtain rain system was utilized. The loading equipment includes a loading steel frame with high capacity and a loading jack with 50-ton capacity. The loading system works hydraulically with closed-loop algorithm. In the experimental tests, only one layer of geogrid with the commercial name of CE121B was used, which was installed at 50 mm below the footing surface (equal to the ratio of the embedment depth to the plate diameter of 0.17). The ultimate bearing capacity of the footing (plate) was obtained experimentally for both non-reinforced and reinforced soil conditions. In order to investigate the footing behavior under cyclic loading, the footing was first loaded under static force equal to 33% of the corresponding ultimate bearing capacity and then, the cyclic loading was applied.The dynamic loading was harmonic with three different frequencies of 1, 2, and 4 Hz along with 1000 cycles with the amplitude of 20% ofthestatic ultimate bearing capacity of the footing. The results show that the variation of the cyclic settlement is almost linearwith the logarithm of number of cycles. In addition, comparison of the results shows that although the frequency has an increasing effect on the cyclic settlement, the effect of frequency is not so much. The cyclic settlement increases 18% if the frequency augments from 1 to 4 Hz. The applied load under the footing at the post-cyclic condition was also investigated for different footing settlements for all loading frequency levels. It was observed that generally, there is the same trend regardless of the level of footing settlement. There is a small increase in the loading (less than 10%) at the frequency of 2 Hz, such that it can be concluded that the frequency has very small effect on the pressure under the footing. The induced tensile strain in the geogrid layer was also investigated and it was found that for the applied loading conditions in this study, the loading frequency has no effect on it.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cyclic Plate Load Test
  • Reinforced Soil
  • Loading Frequency
  • Bearing capacity
  • Settlement
  1. Puri, V.K., Yen, S.C., Das, B.M., and Yeo, B. (1993) Cyclic load-induced settlement of a square foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 12(6), 587–597.
  2. Shin, E.C., Das, B.M., Kim, S.S., Imamoto, H., and Yeo, B.C. (1995) Permanent settlement of a square shallow foundation sand due to cyclic load. Proc. Conf. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 779-783.
  3. Das, B.M. and Shin, E.C. (1994) Strip foundation on geogrid reinforced clay: behavior under cyclic loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 13(10), 657–667.
  4. El Sawwaf, M. and Nazir, A.K. (2010) Behavior of repeatedly loaded rectangular footings resting on reinforced sand. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 49(4), 349–356.
  5. Moghaddas Tafreshi, S.N. and Dawson, A.R. (2012) A comparison of static and cyclic loading responses of foundations on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 32, 55–68.
  6. Hotti, B., Rakaraddi, P.G., and Kodde, S. (2014) Behavior of square footing resting on reinforced sand subjected to incremental loading and unloading. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3, 1-8.
  7. Abrishami, S. (2010) The Study of Cyclic Bearing Capacity of Dry Geogrid-Reinforced Sand by Physical Modeling. Ph.D. Thesis, Amirkabir University of Technology (Polytechnique) (in Persian).
  8. ASTM, D. 1194-94 (2003) Standard Test Method for Bearing Capacity of Soil for Static Load and Spread Footings. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  9. Tabaroei, A. (2018) A study on behavior of granular soil reinforced with geogrid based on cyclic plate load test. Ph.D. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research branch (in Persian).
  10. Tabaroei, A., Abrishami, S., and Seyedi Hosseininia, E. (2017) Comparison between two different pluviation setups of sand specimens. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. ASCE, 29(10), 04017157.
  11. ASTM, D. 422-63 (2007) Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  12. ASTM, D. 2216. (2010) Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil, Rock, and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  13. ASTM, D. 854-10 (2010) Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. The ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  14. ASTM, D. 4254-00 (2002) Standard Test Method for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  15. ASTM, D. 3080/D. 3080M (2011) Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils under Consolidated Drained Conditions. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  16. ASTM, D. 2487-11 (2011) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). Annual book of ASTM standards, ASTM international, West Conshohocken, PA.
  17. ASTM, D. 6637 (2011) Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Geogrids by the Single or Multi-Rib Tensile Method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  18. Tabaroei, A., Abrishami, S., Seyedi Hosseininia, E., and Ganjian, N. (2019) An experimental study on bearing capacity of circular footing resting on geogrid reinforced granular soil. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, DOI: 10.22060/CEEJ.2017.13150.5339, in press (in Persian).
  19. Das, B.M. and Sobhan, K. (2013) Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. 8th ed., Cengage Learning, Stamford.
  20. Das, B.M. and Luo, Z. (2016) Principles of Soil Dynamics, Cengage Learning.