مطالعه آزمایشگاهی مدول یانگ خاکهای دانه ای با استفاده از آزمایش سه محوری سیکلیک با اندازه گیری موضعی کرنش

نوع مقاله : یادداشت پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد نجف‌آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف‌آباد، ایران

چکیده

در این تحقیق تأثیر خصوصیات دانه‌بندی از جمله درصد شن، تحکیم ناهمسان، روش ساخت نمونه، تنش همه‌جانبه و دانسیته نسبی بر روی مدول یانگ خاک دانه‌ای مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که با اضافه شدن شن به ماسه میزبان در یک سطح تنش و دانسیته نسبی خاص، مقدار مدول یانگ خاک در سطوح کرنش‌های کوچک افزایش یافته است، ولی تأثیر آن در سطوح کرنش بزرگ تقریباً ناچیز است. از طرف دیگر با افزایش تنش همه‌جانبه، اثر مقدار شن اضافه شده بر روی تغییرات مدول یانگ کاسته می‌شود. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که مدول یانگ روند افزایشی با افزایش تنش همه‌جانبه و دانسیته نسبی دارد. همچنین نتایج آزمایش‌های ناهمسان نشان می‌دهد که در نمونه‌های تحکیم یافته تحت تحکیم ناهمسان با افزایش تنش انحرافی اولیه در زمان تحکیم نسبت به نمونه‌های تحکیم یافته در حالت همسان، مقدار مدول یانگ افزایش می‌یابد. از طرف دیگر در نمونه‌های تحکیم یافته در حالت تحکیم ناهمسان با کاهش تنش انحرافی اولیه نسبت به حالت همسان مقدار مدول یانگ کاهش می‌یابد. نتایج همچنین نشان می‌دهد که روش‌های متفاوت ساخت نمونه‌های دست‌خورده تأثیر مهمی بر روی تغییرات مدول یانگ دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


  1. Wichtmann, T. and Triantafyllidis, T. (2009) On the correlation of “static” and “dynamic” stiffness moduli of non-cohesive soils. Bautechnik, 86(1), 28-39.
  2. Asef, M.R. and Farrokhrouz, M. (2017) A semi-empirical relation between static and dynamic elastic modulus. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 157, 359-363.
  3. Wichtmann, T., Kimmig, I., and Triantafyllidis, T. (2017) On correlations between “dynamic” (small-strain) and “static” (large-strain) stiffness moduli – An experimental investigation on 19 sands and gravels. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 98, 72-83.
  4. Camacho-Tauta, J. (2013) Shear modulus reduction curves of Guayuriba sands by cyclic triaxial and bender element tests. Third International Conference on Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment, Nagoya, Japan, 3-9.
  5. Cai, Y., Dong, Q., Wang, J., Gu, C., and Xu, C. (2015) Measurement of small strain shear modulus of clean and natural sands in saturated condition using bender element test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 76, 100-110.
  6. Kawaguchi, T., Mitachi, T., Shibuya, S., and Sano, Y. (2001) Evaluation of elastic shear modulus G in laboratory bender element test. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1(694), 195-207.
  7. Camacho-Tauta, J.F., Reyes-Ortiz, O.J., and Álvarez, J.D.J. (2013) Comparison between resonant-column and bender element tests on three types of soils. Dyna (Colombia), 80(182), 163-172.
  8. Madhusudhan, B.N. and Senetakis, K. (2016) Evaluating use of resonant column in flexural mode for dynamic characterization of Bangalore sand. Soils and Foundations, 56(3), 574-580.
  9. Souto, A., Hartikainen, J., and Özüdoğru, K. (1994) Measurement of dynamic parameters of road pavement materials by the bender element and resonant column tests. Geotechnique, 44(3), 519-526.
  10. Cabalar, A.F. (2010) Applications of the oedometer, triaxial and resonant column tests to the study of micaceous sands. Engineering Geology, 112(1–4), 21-28.
  11. Cherian, A.C. and Kumar, J. (2016) Effects of vibration cycles on shear modulus and damping of sand using resonant column tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142(12), 1-6.
  12. Moayerian, S. (2012) Effect of Loading Frequency on Dynamic Properties of Soils Using Resonant Column. Civil Engineering (Master's thesis, University of Waterloo).
  13. Goudarzy, M., Rahman, M.M., König, D., and Schanz, T. (2016) Influence of non-plastic fines content on maximum shear modulus of granular materials. Soils and Foundations, 56(6), 973-983.
  14. Goudarzy, M., Rahemi, N., Rahman, M.M., and Schanz, T. (2017) Predicting the maximum shear modulus of sands containing nonplastic fines. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 143(9), 06017013.
  15. Chien, L.K. and Oh, Y.N. (2002) Influence of fines content and initial shear stress on dynamic properties of hydraulic reclaimed soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(1), 242-253.
  16. Zhu, S., Yang, G., Wen, Y., and Ou, L. (2014) Dynamic shear modulus reduction and damping under high confining pressures for gravels. Geotechnique Letters, 4, 179-186.
  17. Biglari, M. and Ashayeri, I. (2012) An empirical model for shear modulus and damping ratio of unsaturated soils. 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Unsaturated Soils, 2(Cl), 499-503.
  18. Kallioglou, P., Tika, T., Koninis, G., Papadopoulos, S., and Pitilakis, K. (2009) Shear modulus and damping ratio of organic soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 27(2), 217-235.
  19. Maher, M.H., Ro, K.S., and Welsh, J.P. (1994) High strain dynamic modulus and damping of chemically grouted sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 13(2), 131-138.
  20. Zhang, J., Andrus, R.D., and Juang, C.H. (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(4), 453-464.
  21. Ishihara, K. (1997) Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics. Clarendon Press.
  22. Atkinson, J.H., Coop, M.R., Stallebrass, S.E., and Viggiani., G. (1993) Measurement of stiffness of soils and weak rocks in laboratory tests. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30(5), 277.
  23. Enomoto, T. (2016) Effects of grading and particle characteristics on small strain properties of granular materials. Soils and Foundations, 56(4), 745-750.
  24. Seed, H.B., Wong, R.T., Idriss, I.M., and Tokimatsu, K. (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 112(11), 1016–1032.
  25. Kokusho, T. (1980) Cyclic Triaxial Test of Dynamic Soil Properties for Wide Strain Range. Soils and Foundations, 20(2), 45-60.
  26. Tanaka, Y., Kudo, K., Yoshida, Y., and Ikemi, M. (1987) A study on the mechanical properties of sandy gravel-dynamica properties of reconstituted sample. Report of Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry.
  27. Hardin, B. (1973) Shear Modulus of Gravels. Report TR74-73- CE19, Civil Engineering Department, University of Kentucky.
  28. Lin, S.-Y., Lin, P.S., Luo, H.-S., and Juang, C.H. (2000) Shear modulus and damping ratio characteristics of gravelly deposits. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37(3), 638-651.
  29. Cuccovillo, T. and Coop, M.R. (1997) The measurement of local axial strains in triaxial tests using LVDTs. Geotechnique, 47(1), 167-171.
  30. De Gennaro, V., Canou, J., Dupla, J.C., and Benahmed, N. (2004) Influence of loading path on the undrained behaviour of a medium loose sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41(1), 166-180.
  31. Wichtmann, T., Niemunis, A., and Triantafyllidis, T. (2007) On the influence of the polarization and the shape of the strain loop on strain accumulation in sand under high-cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(1), 14-28.
  32. Finge, Z., Doanh, T., and Dubujet, P. (2006) Undrained anisotropy of Hostun RF loose sand: New experimental investigations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 43(11), 1195-1212.
  33. Sivathayalan, S. and Vaid, Y.P. (2002) Influence of generalized initial state and principal stress rotation on the undrained response of sands. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(1), 63-76.
  34. Benahmed, N. (2001) Comportement Mécanique D’un Sable Sous Cisaillement Monotone Et Cyclique. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris.
  35. Uthayakumar, M. and Vaid, Y.P. (1998) Static liquefaction of sands under multiaxial loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(2), 273-283.
  36. Vaid, Y.P., Chung, E.K.F., and Kuerbis, R.H. (1990) Stress path and steady state. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27(1), 1-7.
  37. Zhou, W., Chen, Y., Ma, G., Yang, L., and Chang, X. (2017) A modified dynamic shear modulus model for rockfill materials under a wide range of shear strain amplitudes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, 229-238.
  38. Stahl, M. and Konietzky, H. (2011) Discrete element simulation of ballast and gravel under special consideration of grain-shape, grain-size and relative density. Granular Matter, 13(4), 417-428.
  39. Wang, Y.H. and Mok, C.B. (2008) Mechanisms of small-strain shear-modulus anisotropy in soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(10), 1516-1530.
  40. Yamamuro, J.A., Wood, F.M., and Lade, P. V. (2008) Effect of depositional method on the microstructure of silty sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(11), 1538-1555.
  41. Yamashita, S., Hori, T., and Suzuki, T. (2005) Effects of initial and induced anisotropy on initial stiffness of sand by triaxial and bender elements tests. Geomechanics: Testing, modeling, and simulation, 350-369.
  42. Burland, J.B. and Symes, M. (1982) A simple axial displacement gauge for use in the triaxial apparatus. Geotechnique, 32(1), 62-65.
  43. Scholey, G.K., Frost, J.D., Lo Presti, D.C.F., and Jamiolkowskt, M. (1995) A review of instrumentation for measuring small strains during triaxial testing of soil specimens. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 18(2), 137-156.
  44. Clayton, C.R.I., Khatrush, S.A., Bica, A. V.D., and Siddique, A. (1990) Discussion on “the use of hall effect semiconductors in geotechnical instrumentation.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 13(1), 63-67.
  45. ASTM D4254 (2006) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International.
  46. ASTM D 4253 (2013) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International.
  47. Borhani, A. and Fakharian, K. (2016) Effect of particle shape on dilative behavior and stress path characteristics of Chamkhaleh sand in undrained triaxial tests. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(4), 197-208.
  48. Selig, E. and Ladd, R (1978) Preparing test specimens using undercompaction. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1(1), 16.
  49. ASTM D 4767 (2011). Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM International.
  50. ASTM (2013) Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus. ASTM International.
  51. Yasuda, Y., Matsumoto, N., Yoshioka, R., and Takahashi, M. (1997) Undrained monotonic and cyclic strength of compacted rockfill material from triaxial and torsional simple shear tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34(3), 357-367.
  52. Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M., and Dey, A. (2017) Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 99(May), 157-167.
  53. Ghodrati, A. and Araei, A.A. (2017) Artificial neural networks for modeling shear modulus and damping behavior of gravelly materials. International Journal of Geomechanics, 17(2), 4016060.
  54. Yamada, S., Hyodo, M., Orense, R.P., Dinesh, S. V., and Hyodo, T. (2008) Strain-dependent dynamic properties of remolded sand-clay mixtures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(7), 972-981.
  55. Puzrin, A.M. and Shiran, A. (2000) Effects of the constitutive relationship on seismic response of soils. Part I. Constitutive modeling of cyclic behavior of soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 19(5), 305-318.
  56. Yoshida, N., Yasuda, S., Kiku, H., and Sawada, S. (2004) Laboratory test for deformation characteristics of sand under level 2 ground motion. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  57. Wang, G.X. and Kuwano, J. (1999) Modeling of strain dependency of shear modulus and damping of clayey sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 18(6), 463-471.
  58. Bayat, M. and Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2018) Stiffness degradation and damping ratio of sand-gravel mixtures under saturated state. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(10), 1261-1277.
  59. Bayat, M. and Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2019) Influence of depositional method on dynamic properties of granular soil. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(6), 907-920.