Investigation of Near-Fault Earthquake Vertical Component Effect on the Seismic Behavior of Isolated Bridges

Document Type : Articles

Authors

1 Department of Structural Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In bridge design codes such as AASHTO, there is not a direct and explicit relation for considering the effects of the earthquakevertical component in the design of elastomeric supports. In lieu, AASHTO recommends a 20% reduction or increase of the dead load amount in its seismic isolators design guide for considering the earthquake vertical component without taking into account the acceleration vertical component, soil type, distance to fault, etc. While the earthquake vertical component in near-fault areas are strong and significantly increase responses in the bridge. In this study, Sadr bridge located in northeast of Tehran in which low damping rubber seismic isolators are used, is investigated under the effect of the vertical component of some earthquake accelerograms with near-fault properties. Besides, the non-linear time history analysis is performed for each of them. Results show that the earthquake vertical component in near-fault areas will significantly increase the response of bridge members such as the increase of the maximum axial force of the bridge piers, deck acceleration, shear and bending moment in the deck cross section and is much higher than the 20% increase or decrease of the dead load given in the code. In order to investigate the seismic isolators behavior due to the increase of the axial compressive force under the effect of the earthquake vertical component, a simple model of isolators with the capability of considering the stiffness variations in the vertical and horizontal directions and performing the buckling stability analysis was prepared, and the isolators responses for three different lateral loadings including the application of monotonic transverse displacement, cyclic loading and earthquake loading were obtained. For all three lateral loadings, the results show that the increase of the compressive axial force decrease the isolators’ lateral stiffnessand increasing the lateral displacement will increase the isolators’ axial deformation. Besides, the hysteresis curve of the isolators will experience a reduction in the stiffness and lateral strength. In the following, the buckling capacity amount obtained from the isolation model with the capability of buckling analysis is compared with the buckling capacity amount obtained from the conventional recommended relations. The results show that the conventional relations slightly overestimate the buckling capacity and the use of buckling analysis models is preferable. In order to decrease the effects of the earthquake vertical component in the isolated structures, three-dimensional isolation is recommended through simultaneous application of vertical and horizontal flexibility in the isolators. The results show that the decrease in bridge response such as the midspan vertical acceleration, deck shear and bending moment has a descending trend with the isolators’ vertical stiffness reduction.

Keywords


  1. Papazoglou, A.J. and Elnashai, A.S. (1996) Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25(10), 1109-1138.
  2. Abdollahiparsa, H., Homami, P., and Khoshnoudian, F. (2016) Effect of vertical component of an earthquake on steel frames considering soil-structure interaction. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(7), 2790-2801.
  3. Hosseinzadeh, N. (2008) Vertical component effect of earthquake in seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge piers. Proceedings of 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China (06-0050).
  4. Shrestha, B. (2015) Seismic response of long span cable-stayed bridge to near-fault vertical ground motions. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(1), 180-187.
  5. Warn, G.P. and Whittaker, A.S. (2008) Vertical earthquake loads on seismic isolation systems in bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(11), 1696-1704.
  6. Mazza, F. and Vulcano, A. (2004) Effects of vertical acceleration on the response of base-isolated structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
  7. Loghman, V., Khoshnoudian, F., and Banazadeh, M. (2015) Effect of vertical component of earthquake on seismic responses of triple concave friction pendulum base-isolated structures. Journal of Vibration and Control, 21(11), 2099-2113.
  8. Ryan, K.L., Kelly, J.M., and Chopra, A.K. (2005) Nonlinear model for lead–rubber bearings including axial-load effects. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 131(12), 1270-1278.
  9. Vu, B., Unal, M., Warn, G.P., and Memari, A.M. (2014) A distributed flexibility and damping strategy to control vertical accelerations in base-isolated buildings. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 21(4), 503-521.
  10. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2013) Urban Earthquake Engineering. PEER Reports. Proceedings of the U.S. - Iran Seismic Workshop, Tehran, Iran, 383-398.
  11. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2016) OpenSees Software, the Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation. http://OpenSees.Berkeley.edu.
  12. SeismoStruct )2016( Earthquake Engineering Software Solution, http://www.seismosoft.com/ seismostruct.
  13. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., and Fenves, G.L. (2006) OpenSees Command Language Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, http://OpenSees.Berkeley.edu.
  14. Kumar, M., Whittaker, A.S., and Constantinou, M.C. (2014) An advanced numerical model of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 43(13), 1955-1974.
  15. Pant, D.R., Wijeyewickrema, A.C., and ElGawady, M.A. (2013) Appropriate viscous damping for nonlinear time-history analysis of base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(15), 2321-2339.
  16. Ryan, K.L. and Polanco, J. (2008) Problems with Rayleigh damping in base-isolated buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(11), 1780-1784.
  17. Somerville, P.G. (1998) Development of an improved representation of near fault ground motions. SMIP98 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data (Vol. 15).
  18. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) (2013) Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) Database. http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/site.
  19. Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center (2014) Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (Standard No 2800), 4th Edition, Tehran, 13-20.
  20. SeismoMatch )2016( Earthquake Engineering Software Solution. http://www.seismosoft.com/ seismomatch.
  21. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2010) Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE SEI 7-10), Virginia.
  22. Abrahamson, N.A. (1992) Non-stationary spectral matching. Seismological Research Letters, 63(1), 30.
  23. Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J., Abrahamson, N.A., Bommer, J.J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E.M.M.A., and Mendis, R. (2006) An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10(spec01), 67-89.
  24. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program NEHRP, Consultants Joint Venture A partnership of the Applied Technology Council and the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, NIST GCR 11-917-15 (November 2011) Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analyses, California, 3-22 to 3-23.
  25. Lee, H. and Mosalam, K. (2014) Effect of Vertical Acceleration on Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns (No. PEER 2014/04).
  26. Koh, C.-G. and Kelly, J.M. (1987) Effects of Axial Load on Elastomeric Isolation Bearings. Rep. No. UCB/EERC-86/12. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
  27. American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2012) AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 6th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, DC.
  28. American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2010) Guide Specifications for Seismic Isolation Design. AASHTO, Washington, DC.
  29. Buckle, I.G., Constantinou, M.C., Diceli, M., and Ghasemi, H. (2006) Seismic Isolation of Highway Bridges (No. MCEER-06-SP07).
  30. Weisman, J. and Warn, G.P. (2011) Stability of elastomeric and lead-rubber seismic isolation bearings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(2), 215-223.