Correlation between Seismic Parameters of far and Near Fault Ground Motion and Response of Moment Resisting Steel Frames

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Graduate, Department of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

2 . Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

Abstract

In seismic countries, with regard to the damages and losses caused by ground motion, the earthquake resistant design of structures is a critical matter. Previous earthquakes have shown that the regulation in seismic codes does not guarantee the buildings to resist against seismic forces and may cause severe damage in the structures. This subject goes back to the design philosophy in seismic code and also weakness in the hypothesis of seismic design of structures. Noted that, the earthquake records include many inherent parameters affected the response of the structures. Meanwhile the seismic codes use only a few of them in the designing process such as spectral acceleration at the first mode period, i.e., Sa(T1) and well-known parameter PGA. In recent decades, many studies focus on the correlation between seismic parameters and the response of structures and found out that the used parameters in the codes do not have the best correlation with the response of structures. This finding depends on the databank of the records including the site-to-fault distance intensity of the earthquake, frequency content etc. as well as the type of earthquake resistant structure. This paper deals with a comprehensive study on the correlation between both far-field and near-field earthquake parameters and response of moment resisting steel frames. For this purpose, a series of nonlinear time history analyses were carried out on 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 20 moment resisting steel frame using OpenSEES. 107 records pair included 100 far-field records and 114 near-field records were selected from FEMA P695 as well as Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) databases. 26 seismic parameters were extracted from these records, i.e. 5564 earthquake parameters were considered. Two damage indices including maximum inter-story drift (MISD) and the amount of absorbed energy were calculated in studied frames. To assess the relationship between seismic parameters and structural damage Pearson correlation coefficient was determined. The results show that Corvoda, Sa(T1), PGV, velocity spectral intensity (VSI), Housner intensity have the best correlation with response of structure in MISD and structure absorb energy in both far-field and near-field earthquakes. Also, the correlation coefficient of displacement dependent parameters is enhanced by increasing the number of stories. Moreover, the results indicate a weak correlation between PGA and response of structures for both MISD and absorbed energy as reported by previous researches. It should be noted that due to the rich frequency content of near-field earthquakes, the correlation of their parameters with seismic response of the studied frames was sensitive to the frames height. Noted that the short period structures (short height) are named acceleration sensitive and the medium and high rise building are recognized as velocity and displacement sensitive, respectively. Therefore, because of rich frequency content of near-field earthquakes, the correlation between acceleration based parameters such as PGA and displacement response of the structures are reduced by increasing the frame height. In a contrary manner, the correlation between damage indices of the structures with displacement based parameters is increased by increasing the frame height. Meanwhile, the correlation between damage indices of the structures with velocity based parameters such as PGV is the most for mid-rise structures. According to the result it can be concluded that the parameters depended on velocity like Housner intensity and velocity spectral intensity have the best correlation with MISD and absorbed energy. Also, the parameters depended on earthquake duration like Significant Duration and Effective Duration have weak correlation with the response of structures. It is shown that one cannot expect the longer duration earthquake result in more damage i.e. maximum story drift in structures.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Elnashai, A.S. and Di Sarno, L. (2008) Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering. New York: Wiley.
  1. Alvanitopoulos, P.F., Andreadis, I., and Elenas, A. (2009) Interdependence between damage indices and ground motion parameters based on Hilbert–Huang transform. Measurement Science and Technology, 21(2), 025101.
  2. Elenas, A. and Liolios, A. (1996) Earthquake induced nonlinear behavior of reinforced concrete frame structures in relation with characteristic acceleration parameters. Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Seismic Zonation, 1013-1020.
  3. Chen, Z. and Wei, J. (2013) Correlation between ground motion parameters and lining damage indices for mountain tunnels. Natural Hazards, 65(3), 1683-1702.
  4. Chen, Z., Shi, C., Li, T., and Yuan, Y. (2012) Damage characteristics and influence factors of mountain tunnels under strong earthquakes. Natural Hazards, 61(2), 387-401.
  5. Akkar, S. and Özen, Ö. (2005) Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(13), 1551-1571.
  6. Cao, V.V. and Ronagh, H.R. (2014) Correlation between seismic parameters of far-fault motions and damage indices of low-rise reinforced concrete frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 66, 102-112.
  7. Barbosa, A.R., Ribeiro, F.L., and Neves, L.A. (2017) Influence of earthquake ground‐motion duration on damage estimation: application to steel moment resisting frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(1), 27-49.
  8. Nikoo, B., Haghshenas, M., and Eslamdoust, R. (2016) Assesment of interdependency between Near–Field seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage index in the concrete buildings. International Conference on Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urban Planning and Sustainable Environment, Istanbul, Turkey.
  9. Habibi, A. and Jami, E. (2017) Correlation between ground motion parameters and target displacement of steel structures. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(2), 163-174.
  10. Housner, G.W. (1952) Spectrum intensities of strong-motion earthquakes. Proceeding of the symposium on earthquake and blast effects on structures in Los Angeles, California, 20-36.
  11. Elenas, A. (2010) Correlation between seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage indices of buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 93-100.
  12. Mohammad, S.S., Sasan, M., and Ali, K-C. (2013) Interrelation between time-frequency domain parameters of earthquake records and structural damage index for medium height RC frames. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(20), 2734-2742.
  13. Safi, M. and Soleymani, A. (2014) Investigation of correlations between seismic parameters and damage indices for earthquakes of Iran International Journal of Engineering, 27(2), 283-292.
  14. Maniyar, M.M. and Khare, R.K. (2011) Selection of ground motion for performing incremental dynamic analysis of existing reinforced concrete buildings in India. Current Science, 100(5), 701-713.
  15. Kenari, M.S. and Celikag, M. (2019) Correlation of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Seismic Damage Indices of Masonry-Infilled Steel Frames. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44(5), 5131-5150.
  16. Pinzón, L.A., Vargas-Alzate, Y.F., Pujades, L.G., and Diaz, S.A. (2020) A drift-correlated ground motion intensity measure: Application to steel frame buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 132, 106096.
  17. Kamal, M. and Inel, M. (2021) Correlation between ground motion parameters and displace-ment demands of mid-rise RC buildings on soft soils considering Soil-Structure-Interaction. Buildings, 11(3), 1-20.
  18. FEMA P695 (2009) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Applied Technology Council, and United States Federal Emergency Management Agency. US Department of Homeland
  19. Kramer, S.L. (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Pearson Education India.
  20. Park, Y.J., Ang, A.H.S., and Wen, Y.K. (1984) Seismic damage analysis and damage-limiting design of reinforced concrete building. Structural Research Series, 516.
  21. Naeim, F. (2001) The Seismic Design Handbook, 2nd
  22. Dimopoulos, A.I., Bazeos, N., and Beskos, D.E. (2012) Seismic yield displacements of plane moment resisting and x-braced steel frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 41, 128-140.
  23. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., and Fenves, G.L. (2007) The OpenSees Command Language Manual, Version 2.0. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  24. Mohammadi, M. and Motovali Emami, S.M. (2019) Multi-bay and pinned connection steel infilled frames; an experimental and numerical study. Engineering Structures, 188, 43-59.
  25. Spiegel, M.R. (1966) Theory and Problems of Statistics. Ed. revol. London: McGraw-Hill.
  26. Gibbons, J.D. and Chakraborti, S. (2020) Nonpara-metric Statistical Inference. CRC Press.
  27. Montgomery, D.C. and Runger, G.C. (2010) Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. John Wiley & Sons.