Effect of Bolted Splice Design Method on Seismic Performance and Prequalification of Column-Tree Connections

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Graduate, Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Moment resisting steel frames (MRSFs) are widely used as a lateral load resisting system in steel structures in very high seismic regions. The seismic performance of this system depends mainly on the behavior of beam-to-column moment connections such that trivial damages in the connections may lead to the collapse of the whole structure or at least post-earthquake demolition of the structure. In the 1994 Northridge earthquake, beam-to-column connections in the MRSFs damaged noticeably and unexpectedly. Several researchers then proposed various suggestions to improve the seismic performance of beam to column connections. One of these suggestions was using a column-tree system to avoid the low-quality field-welded moment connections. These days, column-tree connections are widely used in the special moment resisting frames (SMRFs) buildings due to their well-known ease of installation and inspection of welding zone, especially in the high seismic areas. However, the prequalification and seismic behavior of these connections had not been evaluated well prior to this research; hence the structural designers usually consider these connections as the prequalified connection for using in the SMRFs without following a robust and validated approach. Therefore, in this study, the effect bolted splice design method on the prequalification and cyclic response of the column-tree connections were investigated using experimentally validated finite element analysis in ABAQUS FEA software. The column-tree connection must be designed such that the ductile failure modes occur prior to the brittle failure modes. This may be achieved through an appropriate design approach. Based on the bolted joint type in the AISC specification (i.e., pre-tensioned joint and slip-critical joint) and removing plastic hinge from the column edge (weakened bolted splice), there are three bolted splice design methods available. These are bolted splice design methods based on the slip critical joint, pre-tensioned joint, and weak splice plates. This research studied three samples to evaluate the effects of the bolted splice design methods on the prequalification and seismic behavior of the connection. The results show that the column-tree connection prequalification depends on the bolted splice design methods; moreover, the bolted splice design method influences the monotonic and cyclic behavior, strength, stiffness, fracture tendency, ductility, and energy dissipation characteristics of the connection. Also, it is observed that based on the moment strength and rotational stiffness of the bolted splice, the column-tree connection is classified as a rigid or semi-rigid moment connection. This is a significant point that needs to be taken into account in the column-tree moment frame design. The structural designers should consider these effects in their design approach for the column-tree connections. The column-tree connection with its bolted splice designed based on the pre-tensioned joint exhibits a reduction in the fracture tendency and increase in the ductility of the connection and also a smaller number of required bolts. For these reasons, it is recommended that the pre-tensioned joint method be implemented in designing a bolted splice instead of the slip-critical joint method.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Hamburger, R.O. and Malley, J.O. (2009) Seismic Design of Steel Special Moment Frames. NIST GCR, 09-917.
  2. Astaneh-Asl, A. (1997) Seismic design of steel column-tree moment-resisting frames. Structural Steel Educational Council.
  3. Oh, K., Li, R., Chen, L., Hong, S.B., and Lee, K. (2014) Cyclic testing of steel column-tree moment connections with weakened beam splices. International Journal of Steel Structures14(3), 471-478.
  4. Nakashima, M., Inoue, K., and Tada, M. (1998) Classification of damage to steel buildings observed in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Engineering Structures20(4-6), 271-281.
  5. Lee, C.H. and Park, J.W. (1998) Cyclic seismic testing of full-scale column-tree type steel moment connections. Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction10(4), 629-639.
  6. Chen, C.C., Lin, C.C., and Lin, C.H. (2006) Ductile moment connections used in steel column-tree moment-resisting frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research62(8), 793-801.
  7. Chen, C.C. and Lin, C.C. (2013) Seismic performance of steel beam-to-column moment connections with tapered beam flanges. Engineering Structures48, 588-601.
  8. Lee, K., Oh, K., and So, J. (2016) Bolt slippage evaluation in column-tree steel moment connection on L/d. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE'16), Paper No. ICSENM (Vol. 114).
  9. Zhang, A.L., Guo, Z.P., and Liu, X.C. (2017) Seismic performance of Z-type cantilever beam splices of column–tree connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 133, 97-111.
  10. Gharebaghi, R. and Hosseini, A. (2017) Local behavior of column-tree connections with considering bolt-hole clearance and bolt pretension effects. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(2), 379-388.
  11. Vatansever, C. and Kutsal, K. (2018) Effect of bolted splice within the plastic hinge zone on beam-to-column connection behavior. Steel and Composite Structures, 28(6), 767-778.
  12. ANSI, A. 360-16 (2016) Specification for Structural Steel Buildings.
  13. Astaneh-Asl, A. (1999) Seismic performance and design of bolted steel moment-resisting frames. Engineering Journal36(3), 105-120.
  14. AISC, A. (2016) Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications.
  15. AISC, A. (2016) Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings.
  16. Deolia, P. and Shaikh, F.A. (2016) Finite element analysis to estimate burst pressure of mild steel pressure vessel using Ramberg-Osgood model. Perspectives in Science, 8, 733-735.
  17. Bruneau, M., Uang, C.M., and Whittaker, A. (1998) Ductile Design of Steel Structures (Vol. 389). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  18. Rice, R.C. (2003) Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization (MMPDS): Chapters 1-4 (Vol. 1). National Technical Information Service.
  19. Yun, X. and Gardner, L. (2017) Stress-strain curves for hot-rolled steels. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 133, 36-46.
  20. Simulia, D.S. (2013) ABAQUS 6.13 User’s manual. Dassault Systems, Providence, RI.
  21. Dunne, F. and Petrinic, N. (2005) Introduction to Computational Plasticity. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  22. Azhari, M. and Mirghaderi, R. (2011) Design of Steel Structures. Volume 4, Seismic Design Issues (in Persian).
  23. AIK (2009) Korean Building Code. Architectural Institute of Korea Seoul.
  24. Liao, F., Wang, M., Tu, L., Wang, J., and Lu, L. (2019) Micromechanical fracture model parameter influencing factor study of structural steels and welding materials. Construction and Building Materials, 215, 898-917.
  25. El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T., Vidarsson, E., and Kunnath, S. (1998) Strength and Ductility of FR Welded-Bolted Connections. SAC Report, 98-01.
  26. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000) Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. FEMA.
  27. Chen, C.C., Lin, C.C., and Tsai, C.L. (2004) Evaluation of reinforced connections between steel beams and box columns. Engineering Structures26(13), 1889-1904.
  28. Erfani, S., Asnafi, A.A., and Goudarzi, A. (2016) Connection of I-beam to box-column by a short stub beam. Journal of Constructional Steel Research127, 136-150.
  29. Wang, M., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., and Shi, G. (2013) Numerical study on seismic behaviors of steel frame end-plate connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,90, 140-152.