Seismic Response of Alluvial Deposits due to Vertical Component of Near-Fault Earthquakes

Document Type : Articles

Authors

School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The characteristics of vertical component of earthquakes are essentially different from those of their horizontal components in terms of amplitude and frequency content. This difference is mainly due to the fact that the vertical component is rather influenced by P-waves while the horizontal component is associated with S-waves. It is widely accepted that the energy of the vertical component of earthquakes is usually concentrated over a narrower range of high frequencies compared to that of the horizontal component. This concentration is destructive to engineering structures having vertical fundamental frequency within the high frequency range. During past earthquakes, the collapse of several buildings and bridges has been found to be directly caused by vertical excitations. Previous researches have illustrated that vertical ground motions are mainly influenced by earthquake magnitude, source-to-site distance as well as local site conditions such as geometry and material properties of subsurface soil layers.
Current paper aims to investigate the effects of various local site conditions on vertical component of near-fault earthquakes. To this end, a series of seismic site response analyses based on time-domain equivalent-linear approach were carried out using Quake-W to determine the ground response under simultaneous horizontal and vertical excitations. The site condition was categorized into different soil profiles comprising of different soil types with different Vs30 values rather than the generic site classifications used in seismic design codes. The input seismic motions used in the analyses comprised of 23 acceleration time histories from near-fault earthquakes recorded worldwide in tectonically active regions within distances less than 10 Km from the active faults (RJB ≤ 10 km) and with magnitudes ranging from M = 5.6 to 7.6.
The results of numerical analyses were finally presented in terms of 5% damped V/H spectral ratio at the ground surface. The results were also compared with recent empirical V/H attenuation equations developed by other researchers. It was found that the obtained V/H spectral ratios show better agreement with empirical equations in case of higher-magnitude earthquakes at stiff soils than lower-magnitude ones at soft soils. In all of these cases, Poisson ratio (υ) of the soil that controls the ratio of S-waves to P-waves velocities was considered equal to 0.35 as a general value. It should be added that although υ is influenced by parameters like soil type, confining pressure and void ratio, it critically depends on the degree of saturation of the ground as well as the drainage conditions during loading. The saturation of a soil can result in rapid increase in υ, which in turn increases the P-wave velocity. To better understand this issue, some models were analyzed with a constant Vs30 value of 230 m/s but with different υ values or alternatively different P-wave velocity profiles. It was observed that as υ increased, the agreement between V/H spectral ratio predicted by numerical analysis and those obtained based on empirical equations enhanced. It can be concluded that the degree of saturation of the ground can profoundly affect V/H spectral ratio. This issue is not reflected in current V/H empirical relationships.
In conclusion, the results of current study demonstrate that V/H spectral ratio depend on parameters such as the natural period of the ground for P-wave, Poisson ratio of the soil and the frequency content of the input shaking. Moreover, it was revealed that the inverse of quarter wavelength impedance contract of P-waves shows a good correlation with V/H spectral ratios and can be used for the implementation of site effects into V/H empirical equations.

Keywords


  1. Papazoglou, A. (1995) Near-Source Vertical Earthquake Ground Motion; an Assessment of Causes and Effects. MSc. Dissertation, Imperial College, London.
  2. Elnashai, A. and Papazoglou, A. (1997) Procedures ans spectra for analysis of RC structures subjected to strong vertical earthquake loads. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1, 121-155.
  3. Legeron, F. and Sheikh, M.N. (2009) Bridge support elastic reactions under vertical earthquake ground motion. Engineering Structures, 31(10), 2317-2326.
  4. Hashash, Y.M., Phillips, C., and Groholski, D.R. (2010) Recent advances in non-linear site response analysis. 5th International Conference in Recent Advances in Geotechnical Eartqhuake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Paper No. OSP 4, 1-22.
  5. He, L. (2005) Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading and its Effects on Pile Foundations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California San Diego, USA.
  6. Papazoglou, A. and Elnashai, A. (1996) Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25(10), 1109-1138.
  7. Newmark, N.M., Blume, J.A., and Kapur, K.K. (1973) Seismic Design Spectra for Nuclear Power Plants. Consulting Engineering Services, Urbana, IL.
  8. Niazi, M. and Bozorgnia, Y. (1989) Behavior of vertical ground motion parameters in the near-field. Seismological Research Letters, 60(4).
  9. Niazi, M. and Bozorgnia, Y. (1990) Observed ratios of PGV/PGA and PGD/PGA for deep soil sites across SMART-1 array, Taiwan. Proceedings of Fourth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Palm Springs, CA, 367-374.
  10. Niazi, M. and Bozorgnia, Y. (1992) Behaviour of near source vertical and horizontal response spectra at SMART-1 array, Taiwan. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21(1), 37-50.
  11. Niazi, M. and Bozorgnia, Y. (1992) Behaviour of Near Source Vertical and Horizontal Response Spectra at SMART-1 Array. Taiwan.
  12. Bozorgnia, Y. and Niazi, M. (1993) Distance scaling of vertical and horizontal responsespectra of the Loma Prieta earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22, 695-707.
  13. Bozorgnia, Y., Niazi, M., and Campbell, K.W. (1995) Characteristics of free-field vertical ground motion during the Northridge earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 11, 515-525.
  14. Bozorgnia, Y., Niazi, M., and Campbell, K.W. )1996( Relationship between vertical and horizontal ground motion for the Northridge earthquake. Proceeding of 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico.
  15. Watabe, M., Tohido, M., Chiba, O., and Fukuzawa, R. (1990) Peak accelerations and response spectra of vertical strong motions from near-fieldrecords in USA. Proceeding of 8th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, 301-306.
  16. Silva, W. (1997) Characteristics of Vertical Strong Ground Motions for Applications to Engineering Design. FHWA/NCEER Workshop on the National Representation of Seismic Ground Motion for New and Existing Highway Facilities.
  17. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (Standard No. 2800), 4th Edition.
  18. Bozorgnia, Y. and Campbell, K.W. )2004( The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(2), 175-207.
  19. Ghalandarzadeh, A. and Motamed, R. (2005) Microtremor measurements: an effective tool for site effect studies. Civil Engineering Infra-structures Journal, 38(6), 777-790 (in Persian).
  20. Ghalandarzadeh, A. and Kavand, A. (2010) Determination of shear wave velocity of sedimentary deposits by means of microtremor measurements. Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 44(4), 525-536 (in Persian).
  21. QUAKE/W (2012) The GeoStudio suite, GEO-SLOPE International Ltd., Alberta, Canada.
  22. Elgamal, A.W., Zagal, M., Tang, T.H., and Stepp, J.C. (1995) Lotung downhole array. I: Evaluation of site dynamic properties. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 121(4), 350-362.
  23. Amorosi, A., Elia, G., Boldini, D., and Schiavone, F. (2011) Seismic ground response analysis: comparison between numerical simulations and observed array data. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Santiago, Chile, Paper No. SGRAM.
  24. Borja, R.I., Caho, H.Y., Montans, F., and Lin, C.H. (1999) Nonlinear ground response at Lotung LSST site. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(3), 187-197.
  25. Borja, R.I., Lin, C.H., Sama, K.M., and Masada, G.M. (2000) Modelling non-linear ground response of nonliquefiable soils. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29, 63-83.
  26. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1970) Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Response Analyses. Report EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
  27. Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R. (1991) Effects of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 117(1), 89-107.
  28. PEER Ground Motion Database [Online]. Available: http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu
  29. Bommer, J., Akkar, S., and Kale, O. (2011) A model for vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratios for Europe and Middel East. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(4), 1783-1806.
  30. Gulerce, Z. and Abrahamson, N.A. (2011) Site specific design spectra for vertical ground motion. Earthquake Spectra, 27(4), 1023-1047.
  31. PEER (2013) PEER reports on NGA-West2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Vertical Ground Motions.
  32. Poggi, V., Edwards, B., and Fah, D. (2012) Characterizing the vertical-to-horizontal ratio of grond motion at soft-sediment sites. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(6), 2741-2756.