Analytical Study on Seismic Behavior of Multi-Span Concrete Girder-Slab Bridges with Link Slabs

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

2 Senior Structural Engineer, Construction and Development of Transportation Infrastructures Company, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Multi-span concrete girder bridges with simple supports are the most common highway bridges in Iran. In these bridges, expansion joints are usually installed at each end of simple spans to provide for deck longitudinal movement due to temperature, shrinkage, and creep. The presence of expansion joints causes many problems with regard to bridge maintenance. These problems include filling of the joint with debris, vertical misalignment of the deck, and loss of concrete cover and corrosion of cap beam reinforcement caused by water leakage through the joint. These damages in many multi-span bridges of the country are mainly due to improper maintenance. Elimination of expansion joints at the interior bents has been the subject of recent studies. These studies have led to development of a design concept for jointless bridges. In this approach, the bridge girders are simply supported but the expansion joints are replaced by constructing continuous slabs over the interior bends. The continuous portion of the slab is called the "link slab" and its presence changes the dynamic characteristics and seismic behavior of the bridge. In this paper, the results of seismic analyses of four-span and seven-span concrete girder bridges with and without the link slabs are presented. The analytical study was performed by spectral analysis in both longitudinal and transverse directions of the bridges. Seismic behavior of the bridges was investigated by comparing seismic demands in bridge substructures for various configurations and layout of link slab and expansion joint. The results of this study show that link slabs significantly affect the seismic behavior of the bridges. The total length of the bridge and the arrangement of expansion joints and link slabs on the bridge deck are the dominating parameters affecting the seismic behavior of the bridge and the distribution of the base shear to the substructure elements.

Keywords


  1. Caner, A. and Zia, P. (1998) Behavior and design of link slabs for jointless bridge decks. PCI Journal, 43(3), 68-80.

 

  1. Kim, Y.Y., Fischer, G., and Li, V.C. (2004) Performance of bridge deck link slabs designed with ductile engineered cementitious composite. Structural Journal101(6), 792-801.
  2. Okeil, A.M. and ElSafty, A. (2005) Partial continuity in bridge girders with jointless decks. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction10(4), 229-238.
  3. Wing, K.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2005) Behavior, analysis, and design of an instrumented link slab bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering10(3), 331-344.
  4. Qian, S., Lepech, M.D., Kim, Y.Y., and Li, V.C. (2009) Introduction of Transition Zone Design for Bridge Deck Link Slabs Using Ductile Concrete. ACI Structural Journal106(1).
  5. Lepech, M.D. and Li, V.C. (2009) Application of ECC for bridge deck link slabs. Materials and Structures42(9), 1185.
  6. Ulku, E., Attanayake, U., and Aktan, H. (2009) Jointless bridge deck with link slabs: design for durability. Transportation Research Record, 2131(1), 68-78.
  7. Au, A., Lam, C., Au, J., and Tharmabala, B. (2013) Eliminating deck joints using debonded link slabs: Research and field tests in Ontario. Journal of Bridge Engineering18(8), 768-778.
  8. Haikal, G., Ramirez, J.A., Jahanshahi, M.R., Villamizar, S., and Abdelaleim, O. (2019) Link Slab Details and Materials (Joint Transportation Research Program Publication No. FHWA/IN/ JTRP-2019/10). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
  9. Caner, A., Dogan, E., and Zia, P. (2002) Seismic performance of multisimple-span bridges retrofitted with link slabs. Journal of Bridge Engineering7(2), 85-93.
  10. Pournadaf Haghi, M., Vasseghi, A., and Nateghi, F. (2008) Effect of link slab on seismic response of two span straight and skew bridges. International Journal of Engineering21(3), 257-266.
  11. Sevgili, G. and Caner, A. (2009) Improved seismic response of multisimple-span skewed bridges retrofitted with link slabs. Journal of Bridge Engineering14(6), 452-459.
  12. Sevgili, G. (2007) Seismic Performance of Multisimple-Span Skew Bridges Retrofitted with Link Slabs. Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  13. Panahi, H. and Vasseghi, A. (2008) Study on behavior of multispan concrete bridges with link slabs. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 11(4) (in Persian).
  14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2012) AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 6th Edition, Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  15. Executive Technical Office of the Vice President for Strategic Planning and Supervision (2008) Iranian Design Code for Reinforced Concrete Bridges - Standard 389 (in Persian).
  16. Meng, J.Y. and Lui, E.M. (2000) Seismic analysis and assessment of a skew highway Engineering Structures, 22(11), 1433-1452.
  17. Tahoni, S. (2013) Bridge Design. Tehran University Press, Tehran (in Persian).
  18. Building and Housing Research Center (2008) Iranian Seismic Design Code for Buildings (2014)- Standard. Tehran (in Persian).