Considerations about Seismic Geotechnical Characteristics of Esfahan

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, Arak branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

2 Professor, Geotechnical Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Geotechnical Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Institute for Energy and Hydro Technology (IEHT), Esfahan, Iran

Abstract

Conducting seismic geotechnical microzonation studies from the point of view of site effects requires an assessment of dynamic properties and especially the natural frequency of site in the study area.
Common methods for estimating these parameters include using microtremors measurements and real earthquakes. In addition, in order to study the exact behavior of the site and determine the exact seismic geotechnical model of the region, it is necessary to perform numerical analysis and use the results of microtremor experiments and use geological information in the region. Without using numerical methods, solving problems of the frequency domain is usually impossible. For this purpose, numerical methods obtain the relations and equations governing the domain by examining the differential behavior of the problem (the model under study). In this regard, finite element methods and modeling of energy absorbing boundaries to reduce the reflection data of seismic waves have been used in numerical analysis. Also, in microzonation studies, the scale of work must be selected from valid instruction like TC4. For this purpose, the method of grade 3 in TC4 has been used.
In this research, the study area of Esfahan has been selected, which is one of the important cities in terms of the existence of numerous historical monuments, relatively high population and strategic industries. Unfortunately, in this region, due to its reputation for safety against earthquakes, very few seismic studies and site effect studies have been conducted. Considering seismic characteristics of site in urban planning and design of structures can provide the basis for sustainable and safe development in cities. Carrying out studies in this regard can prevent the construct of structures in any area, which can be in the resonance period or take the necessary measures to minimize damage.
The main geology texture of Esfahan is influenced by two elements. Firstly, the Zayandehrood River, which flows east-west direction in the city of Esfahan, and next the mountains around Esfahan, especially Sofeh Mount, which the main part of the city are affected by its slope.
In this study, using one-dimensional and two-dimensional numerical analysis and microtremor results, geotechnical and seismic studies, the seismic geotechnical behavior of Esfahan region has been studied in the north-south direction (parallel to the topographic changes of the city) and east-west along the river.
One of the significant points identified in this study is the different seismic geotechnical behavior of the north-south and east-west directions with each other and the fact that the behavior of the north-south profile of Esfahan should be considered due to changes of the surrounding environment.
The results show that the behavior of Esfahan site in the north-south direction, which is affected by topographic changes, should be considered as two-dimensional and the east-west direction one-dimensionally can be considered. The results also show that the natural frequency values ​​of Esfahan increase from southern area to northern area respectively. In this study, after related analyzes and comparison of seismic geotechnical results and dynamic analysis, the study area was classified into three categories: The southern areas of the city with a natural period less than 0.4, the central areas with a period range of 0.4 to 0.8 and the northern areas. The city is in the natural period above 0.8 seconds.

Keywords


  1. Hashemi, H. (2010) The Influence of Local Soil Conditions on Seismic Ground Motions in Esfahan. M.Sc. Thesis (in Persian).
  2. Kamalian, M. and Sohrabibidar, A. (2008) Seismic behavior of two-dimensional half-sinus hills against SV waves. Esteghlal Journal, 36(1), 109-130.
  3. Panji, M., Kamalian, M., Asgarimarnani, J., and Jafari, M.K. (2013) Technical literature review on seismic analysis of topographic complications against SH waves. JSEE, 15(4), 1-15.
  4. TC4 (1999) Manual for Zonation on Seismic Geotechnical Hazards. Technical Committee for Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering.
  5. Zaminfanavaran Consultant Co. (2009) Geotechnical Studies on Line-1 of Esfahan Urban Train.
  6. Azmonefoolad Consultant Co. (2015) Geotechnical studies on Line-2 of Esfahan urban train.
  7. Hashemi, H. (2019) Evaluation of Seismic Geotechnical Behavior on Semi of Esfahan City. Ph.D. Thesis (in Persian).
  8. Khademalfoghara, N. (2009) Estimation of Probabilistic Earthquake Risk for Isfahan. Sc. Thesis (in Persian).
  9. Ambraseys, N.N. (1978a) Middle East-a reappraisal of seismicity. The Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 11(1), 19-32.
  10. Brinkgreve, R.B. (2002) Plaxis 2D Version 8.4: Reference. Scientific and Dynamic Manuals, Lisse, Balkema.

 EduPro Civil System, Inc., ProShake (1998) Ground Response Analysis Program by EduPro Civil System, Inc., Redmond, Washington.

  1. Lysmer, J. and Kulmeter, R.L. (1969) Finite dynamic model for infinite media. ASCE J. of the Eng. Mech. Div., 850-877.
  2. Das, B.M. (1995) Fundamental of Soil Dynamics. Elsevier.
  3. Dey, A. (2011) Calibration of a PLAXIS finite element dynamic model: effect of domain width and meshing Schemes/AES. 3rd Indian Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference: 3IYGEC, Indian Geotechnical Society, New Delhi.
  4. Kovacs, W.D., Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M. (I971) Studies of seismic response of clay banks. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE (97-SM2), 441-455.
  5. Kamalian, M., Mohazzab, K., Sohrabi Bidar, A., and Haghshenas, E. (2012) Seismic behavior of 2D semi-sine shaped hills against vertical SV waves. Journal of Computational Methods in Engineering (JCME), 31(1), 25-45 (in Persian).
  6. Ducellier, A. and Hideo, A. (2012) Interactions between topographic irregularities and seismic ground motion investigated using a hybrid FD-FE method. Earthquake Engineering, 18, 773-792.
  7. Baziar, M.H., Siavoshnia, M., and Sadeghpour, N. (2006) An investigation on amplification of earth-quake on soil sample of type IV in 2800 standard. Technical Report of Iranian BHRC (in Persian).
  8. Kamalian, M. et al. (2006) Seismic Geochemical Studies of Qom City (in Persian).
  9. Standard No. 2800 4th Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings.