Influence of Rotational Components of Mode Shapes in Damage Detection of Three Dimensional Structures

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Damage in structural elements causes obvious changes in their physical properties such as stiffness and damping. These changes affect the stiffness and damping matrices of whole building so its mode shapes change. Therefore, mode shapes of existing building are widely used in damage detection methods. Since vibration test can only provide translational components of mode shapes, previous methods mostly worked with this type of data. This paper focused on considering the importance of using some rotational/translational components of the mode shapes to detect damages in structural frames. In order to analyze the frames and update them, an automatic iterative model updating program is developed in MATLAB software that works with OpenSees for conducting finite element analysis. The iterative program evaluates a set of objective functions in each step and tries to optimize them by means of nonlinear least square method. Objective functions are defined based on the combination of two criteria of these four items: comparison between frequencies and/or mode shapes of two situations, the modal assurance criteria (MAC), and the modal flexibility matrices. In each step of the analysis, based on optimization results, a new frame will be modeled in OpenSees software that its elements stiffness is changed according to new sets of data, then finite element analysis will be done and new modal data will be extracted and optimization process will be repeated by new data. To verify the effectiveness of the developed program, two three-dimensional steel structures are modeled and evaluated, one of them is a five-story moment resisting frame and the other one is a three-story brace frame. It has been considered that these frames suffered damages which are defined by three different scenarios for each of them. Damage scenarios consist of minor, severe and both minor and severe damages. Actually, in this study, damages are defined by reduction in elements’ stiffness. In fact, damage is a percentage of reduction of stiffness in damaged element in comparison with its healthy condition. Mode shape components and natural frequencies of damaged structures are the only needed input data for the program. To investigate the influence of rotational components in model updating, frames have been analyzed with three types of data in each scenario, all translational or rotational components, and all components of mode shapes. Extensive analyses show that among employed objective function, the one which compares mode shapes is the most successful one in damage detection, also modal flexibility can be effective when it works by only rotational components of mode shapes. The findings indicated that the translational components of mode shapes are not capable of detecting damages accurately. Results of model updating by use of only translational components of mode shapes indicate that not only the damages’ location and their intensities could not be predicted, but also several false damages are reported in undamaged elements. It can be concluded that using rotational data leads to more precise results in determining both damages’ locations and their intensities. Besides, the number of false damage detection has been decreased by use of rotational components. It means, when the rotational components are employed, the methods report no damage in healthy elements or the amount of detected damage is very small that can be ignored. Real data extracted from existing building are always polluted by noises due to human or machine faults or sometimes errors in numerical methods lead to inexact input data. Since the data employed in this study are exact numerical data, to consider the effects of these errors, analytical modal data has been polluted by some noises. These noises are generated by use of random function in MATLAB software. Surprisingly, the results show that even with noisy data, the proposed method can detect damages precisely.

Keywords


  1. Hwang, H. and C. Kim, (2004) Damage detection in structures using a few frequency response measure-ments. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 270(1-2), 1-14.
  2. Ismail, Z. (2012) Application of residuals from regression of experimental mode shapes to locate multiple crack damage in a simply supported reinforced concrete beam. Measurement, 45(6), 1455-1461.
  3. Ismail, Z., Ibrahim, Z., Ong, Z. C. and Rahman, A. G. A. (2012) Approach to reduce the limitations of modal identification in damage detection using limited field data for nondestructive structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed concrete bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17(6), 867-875.
  4. Ismail, Z. and Ong, Z.C. (2012) Honeycomb damage detection in a reinforced concrete beam using frequency mode shape regression. Measurement, 45(5), 950-959.
  5. Fayyadh, M., H.A. Razak, and Z. Ismail, (2011) Combined modal parameters-based index for damage identification in a beamlike structure: theo-retical development and verification. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 11(3), 587-609.
  6. Rahman, A.G.A., Ismail, Z., Noroozi, S., and Ong, Z.C. (2014) Enhancement of impact-synchronous modal analysis with number of averages. Journal of Vibration and Control, 20(11), 1645-1655.
  7. Rahman, A.G.A., Ong, Z.C., and Ismail, Z. (2012) Crack identification on rotor shaft using experimental modal data. Experimental Techniques, doi. 10: p. 1747-1567.2012.
  8. Rahman, A.G.A., Ong, Z.C., and Ismail, Z. (2011) Effectiveness of impact-synchronous time averag-ing in determination of dynamic characteristics of a rotor dynamic system. Measurement, 44(1),      34-45.

 

  1. Rahman, A.G.A., Ismail, Z., Noroozi, S., and Ong, Z.C. (2013) Study of open crack in rotor shaft using changes in frequency response function International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 22(6), 791-807.
  2. Rahman, A.G.A., Ong, Z.C., and Ismail, Z. (2011) Enhancement of coherence functions using time signals in Modal Analysis. Measurement, 44(10), 2112-2123.
  3. Ismail, Z., Razak, H.A., and Rahman, A.G.A. (2006) Determination of damage location in RC beams using mode shape derivatives. Engineering Structures, 28(11), 1573-1566.
  4. Fox, C. (1992) The location of defects in structures-A comparison of the use of natural frequency and mode shape data. in imac.
  5. Stubbs, N., Kim, J.-T., and Farrar, C. (1995) Field verification of a nondestructive damage locali-zation and severity estimation algorithm, in Proceedings-SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering. SPIE International Society for Optical.
  6. Cha, Y.J. and O. Buyukozturk, (2015). Structural damage detection using modal strain energy and hybrid multiobjective optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 30(5), 347-358.
  7. Shi, Z., Law, S., and Zhang, L. (1998) Structural damage localization from modal strain energy change. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 21(5), 825-844.
  8. Pandey, A. and Biswas, M. (1994) Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 169(1), 3-17.
  9. Yan, A. and Golinval, J.-C. (2005) Structural damage localization by combining flexibility and stiffness methods. Engineering Structures, 27(12), 1752-1761.
  10. Jaishi, B. and Ren, W.-X. (2006) Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 290(1-2), 369-387.
  11. Nadjafi, S., Ghodrati Amiri, G., Zare Hosseinzadeh,, and Seyed Razzaghi, S.A. (2020) An effective approach for damage identification in beam-like structures based on modal flexibility curvature and particle swarm optimization. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 8(1), 109-120.
  12. Alkayem, N.F., Cao, M., Zhang, Y., Bayat, M., and Su, Z. (2018) Structural damage detection using finite element model updating with evolutionary algorithms: a survey. Neural Computing and Applications, 30(2), 389-411.
  13. Ghodrati Amiri, G., Zare Hosseinzadeh, A., and Seyed Razzaghi, S.A. (2015) Generalized flexibility-based model updating approach via democratic particle swarm optimization algorithm for structural damage prognosis. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 5(4), 445-464.
  14. Soltani, A., Sabamehr, A., Chandra, A., and Bagchi, (2018) System Identification and Vibration-Based Damage Detection in a Concrete Shear Wall System. in Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Echanical, and Aerospace Systems 2018. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
  15. Ghannadi, P. and Kourehli, S.S. (2020) Multiverse optimizer for structural damage detection: Numerical study and experimental validation. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 29(13), e1777.
  16. Ahmadi-Nedushan, B. and Fathnejat, H. (2020) A modified teaching–learning optimization algorithm for structural damage detection using a novel damage index based on modal flexibility and strain energy under environmental variations. Engineering with Computers, 1-28.
  17. Gomes, G.F. and de Almeida, F.A. (2020) Tuning metaheuristic algorithms using mixture design: Application of sunflower optimization for structural damage identification. Advances in Engineering Software, 149, p. 102877.
  18. Razavi, M. and Hadidi, A. (2020) Assessment of sensitivity-based FE model updating technique for damage detection in large space structures. Structural Monitoring and Maintenance, 7(3), 261-281.
  19. Gunaydin, M., Adanur, S., and Altunisik, A.C. (2018) Ambient vibration based structural evaluation of reinforced concrete building model. Earthquakes and Structures, 15(3), 335-350.
  20. Chalioris, C.E., Voutetaki, M.E., and Liolios, A.A. (2020) Structural health monitoring of seismically vulnerable RC frames under lateral cyclic loading. Earthquakes and Structures, 19(1), 29-44.
  21. Raufi, F. and Bahar, O. (2012) A new wavelet based-method for damage detection of moment-resisting frame. Sharif Civil Engineering Journal, 29, 127-136 (in persain).
  22. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.J. (1999) Numerical Optimization. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
  23. Hu, S.-L.J., Li, H., and Wang, S. (2007) Cross-model cross-mode method for model updating. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(4), 1690-1703.
  24. Khodayari, R. and Bahar, O. (2019) Identification of story stiffness of shear buildings under ambient vibration tests with highly noise polluted data. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering (in persain).