فصلنامه علوم و مهندسی زلزله

فصلنامه علوم و مهندسی زلزله

بررسی هزینه چرخه عمر در قاب های مهاربندی با مهاربند کمانش‌تاب

نوع مقاله : یادداشت پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری سازه، گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
چکیده
هدف از‌ این تحقیق، ارزیابی هزینه چرخه عمر قاب‌های فولادی با مهاربند کمانش‌تاب طراحی شده در چهارچوب نگرش طراحی مبتنی بر عملکرد می‌باشد. تاثیر زلزله بر طراحی یک سازه با هدف کاهش وزن سازه و کاهش هزینه ساخت اولیه سازه، در نظر گرفته می‌شود، که ممکن است باعث کاهش هزینه ساخت شود ولی در رابطه با هزینه‌هایی آن در طول مدت بهره‌برداری، نمی‌توان برآوردی داشت. در صنعت ساخت و ساز، تصمیم‌گیری‌ها برای انتخاب سیستم‌های سازه‌‌ای در مناطق لرزه‌خیز نیازمند در نظر گرفتن هزینه‌های خسارات وارده در زلزله و برخی اثرات دیگر حاصل از آن در طول عمر مفید سازه می‌باشد. تحلیل هزینه چرخه عمر می‌تواند یک ابزار مهم برای طراحی سازه‌ها مورد استفاده قرار گیرد که در آن می‌توان هزینه اولیه ساخت و هزینه‌های چرخه عمر سازه را کنترل نمود. در گام اول این تحقیق ، دو قاب سه دهانه، سه قاب چهار دهانه و سه قاب پنج دهانه ده طبقه با مهاربند کمانش‌تاب، در چهارچوب مبتنی بر عملکرد، طراحی شده‌اند. در این فاز، از نرم‌افزار OpenSees، جهت انجام مدلسازی و تحلیل‌های غیرخطی، و از نرم‌افزار متلب جهت پیاده‌سازی مسئله طراحی بر اساس عملکرد استفاده شده است. در گام دوم به بررسی هزینه‌ی چرخه عمر قابهای حاصل از طراحی، با استفاده از رابطه ون و کانگ پرداخته شده است. با توجه به نتایج، مشاهده گردید، که در نظرگیری مهاربند کمانش‌تاب در قابهای با یک دهانه مهاربندی کاهش 30، درصدی نسبت قاب هایی با دو و سه دهانه مهاربندی را دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

American Institute of Steel Construction. (2001). Manual of Steel Construction: Load & Resistance Factor Design (2nd ed.).
ASCE/SEI. (2014). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41‑13). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Black, C., Makris, N., & Aiken, I. (2002). Component Testing, Stability Analysis and Characterization of Buckling Restrained Braces (Final Report to Nippon Steel Corporation).
Bazeos, N. (2009). Comparison of three seismic design methods for plane steel frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(3), 553-562.
Building and Housing Research Center. (2014). Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (Standard No. 2800) (in Persian).
Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 561-582.
Eiben, A. E., & Smith, J. E. (2003). Introduction to Evolutionary Computing. Springer.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (1997). NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 274). Washington, DC; 1997.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (FEMA-350). SAC Joint Venture.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA-356).
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2009). Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters (FEMA P695A). Applied Technology Council.
Gholizadeh, S. (2015). Performance-based optimum seismic design of steel structures by a modified firefly algorithm and a new neural network. Advances in Engineering Software, 81, 50-65.
Ghaderi, M., & Gholizadeh, S. (2021). Mainshock–aftershock low-cycle fatigue damage evaluation of performance-based optimally designed steel moment frames. Engineering Structures, 237, 112207.
Kaveh, A., & Nasrollahi, A. (2014). Performance-based seismic design of steel frames utilizing charged system search optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 213-221.
Kaveh, A., Laknejadi, K., & Alinejad, B. (2012). Performance-based multi-objective optimization of large steel structures. Acta Mechanica.
Kang, Y.-J., & Wen, Y. K. (2000). Minimum Life-Cycle Cost Structural Design Against Natural Hazards.
Khatib, I., & Mahin, S. (1987). Dynamic inelastic behavior of chevron braced steel frames. Fifth Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 211-220, Balkema.
Liqiang, J., Lizhong, J., Yi, H., Jihong, Y., & Hong, Z. (2020). Seismic life-cycle cost assessment of steel frames equipped with steel panel walls. Engineering Structures, 211.
Mitropoulou, C. C., Lagaros, N. D., & Papadrakakis, M. (2011). Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(10), 1311-1331.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. (2020). OpenSees (Version 3.4.0) [Computer software]. University of California, Berkeley.
Priestley, M. J. N. (1998). Brief comments on elastic flexibility of reinforced concrete frames and signifi-cance to seismic design. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 31(4).
Rashidi Elashti, A. (2013). Effect of Progressive Damage on Seismic Performance of Steel Building Structures [Master's thesis, Noshirvani University of Technology].
Razavi, N., & Gholizadeh, S. (2021). Seismic collapse safety analysis of performance-based optimally designed reinforced concrete frames considering life-cycle cost. Journal of Building Engineering, 44(44), 103430.
Sabelli, R. (2001). Research on Improving the Design and Analysis of Earthquake Resistant Steel Braced Frames (The 2000 NEHRP Professional Fellowship Report). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
The MathWorks, Inc. (2016). MATLAB: The Language of Technical Computing [Computer software].
Uriz, P. (2005). Towards Earthquake Resistance Design of Concentrically Braced Frames, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Xu, J., Spencer, B. F., & Lu, X. (2017). Performance-based optimization of nonlinear structures subject to stochastic dynamic loading. Engineering Structures, 134, 334-345.
Zou, X. (2007). Multiobjective optimization for performance-based design of reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(10), 1462-1474.
American Institute of Steel Construction. (2001). Manual of Steel Construction: Load & Resistance Factor Design (2nd ed.).
ASCE/SEI. (2014). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41‑13). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Black, C., Makris, N., & Aiken, I. (2002). Component Testing, Stability Analysis and Characterization of Buckling Restrained Braces (Final Report to Nippon Steel Corporation).
Bazeos, N. (2009). Comparison of three seismic design methods for plane steel frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(3), 553-562.
Building and Housing Research Center. (2014). Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (Standard No. 2800) (in Persian).
Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 561-582.
Eiben, A. E., & Smith, J. E. (2003). Introduction to Evolutionary Computing. Springer.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (1997). NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 274). Washington, DC; 1997.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (FEMA-350). SAC Joint Venture.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA-356).
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2009). Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters (FEMA P695A). Applied Technology Council.
Gholizadeh, S. (2015). Performance-based optimum seismic design of steel structures by a modified firefly algorithm and a new neural network. Advances in Engineering Software, 81, 50-65.
Ghaderi, M., & Gholizadeh, S. (2021). Mainshock–aftershock low-cycle fatigue damage evaluation of performance-based optimally designed steel moment frames. Engineering Structures, 237, 112207.
Kaveh, A., & Nasrollahi, A. (2014). Performance-based seismic design of steel frames utilizing charged system search optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 213-221.
Kaveh, A., Laknejadi, K., & Alinejad, B. (2012). Performance-based multi-objective optimization of large steel structures. Acta Mechanica.
Kang, Y.-J., & Wen, Y. K. (2000). Minimum Life-Cycle Cost Structural Design Against Natural Hazards.
Khatib, I., & Mahin, S. (1987). Dynamic inelastic behavior of chevron braced steel frames. Fifth Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 211-220, Balkema.
Liqiang, J., Lizhong, J., Yi, H., Jihong, Y., & Hong, Z. (2020). Seismic life-cycle cost assessment of steel frames equipped with steel panel walls. Engineering Structures, 211.
Mitropoulou, C. C., Lagaros, N. D., & Papadrakakis, M. (2011). Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(10), 1311-1331.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. (2020). OpenSees (Version 3.4.0) [Computer software]. University of California, Berkeley.
Priestley, M. J. N. (1998). Brief comments on elastic flexibility of reinforced concrete frames and signifi-cance to seismic design. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 31(4).
Rashidi Elashti, A. (2013). Effect of Progressive Damage on Seismic Performance of Steel Building Structures [Master's thesis, Noshirvani University of Technology].
Razavi, N., & Gholizadeh, S. (2021). Seismic collapse safety analysis of performance-based optimally designed reinforced concrete frames considering life-cycle cost. Journal of Building Engineering, 44(44), 103430.
Sabelli, R. (2001). Research on Improving the Design and Analysis of Earthquake Resistant Steel Braced Frames (The 2000 NEHRP Professional Fellowship Report). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
The MathWorks, Inc. (2016). MATLAB: The Language of Technical Computing [Computer software].
Uriz, P. (2005). Towards Earthquake Resistance Design of Concentrically Braced Frames, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Xu, J., Spencer, B. F., & Lu, X. (2017). Performance-based optimization of nonlinear structures subject to stochastic dynamic loading. Engineering Structures, 134, 334-345.
Zou, X. (2007). Multiobjective optimization for performance-based design of reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(10), 1462-1474.

  • تاریخ دریافت 26 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 04 دی 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 15 بهمن 1403