Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

The Effect of Coulomb Static Stress Changes on Triggeringthe Future Eventsafter the 31 August 1968 Dasht-e Bayaz Earthquake (Mw = 7.1)

Document Type : Articles

Authors
Saeed Zarei 1
Mohamad Mehdi Khatib 1
Mehdi Zare 2
Seyed Morteza Moussavi 1
1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
2 International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Several large earthquakes have influenced the settlements in the Lut block in the past, causing heavy damages in the region. The Dasht-e Bayaz area is located in the north of the active right-lateral faults of the Sistan suture zone, which may accommodate a large proportion of the about20 mmyr-1 right-lateral shear between Iran and Afghanistan. The numerous Dasht-e Bayaz destructive earthquakes were outstanding clusters of interactive earthquakes that include earthquakes on left-lateral, right-lateral, and reverse faults.New studies have been discussed recently by several authors in which a strong correlation between Coulomb stress changes and the spatialdistribution of earthquakes have been observed. The stress change maps would be useful for earthquake hazard to foresee the most likely locations of the upcoming aftershocks. Generally, the changes in Coulomb stress range from 0.1 to 1 bar, which are considered enough to trigger the future earthquakes. It is perceived that the successive events on the Dasht-e Bayaz areas have characteristic spatial distribution patterns, and the seismicity after the main shocks is consistent with the Coulomb stress change. For all the computations, we used the shear modulus (G) of 3.2 ×105 bars, in a uniform elastic half-space with Poisson’s ratio (ν) of 0.25, Young modulus (E) 8 × 105 bar and an effective coefficient of friction that includes the effect of pore fluid pressure and has been postulated to vary in the range 0.2 –0.8 with an average value of μ'= 0.4 often used. Coulomb 3.3 software is used to calculate Coulomb failure stress changes. The rupture parameters (strike, dip, rake and depth) and source faults of the earthquakes after the 1968 westDasht-e Bayaz earthquakes are defined from the published studies. The empirical relationships proposed by Leonard have been used to calculate the width, length and slip of the source faults and assuming homogeneous fault slip. The calculated Coulomb stress change due to the 1968 W; Dasht-e Bayaz event indicates that this main shock can "trigger" the second one or move the Ferdows thrust fault (1968.09.01, Ferdows earthquake) because it was located on the high stress zone of Coulomb stress changes pattern. Besides, the cumulative effects of Coulomb stress changes due to the 1968 Dasht-e Bayaz and Ferdows events on the Avash fault as a receiver (1976 Vondic event) revealed that the central section of Dasht-e Bayaz and hypocenter of Vondic earthquake is located in the negative lobe ofCoulomb stress changes with 0.2 –0.5 bar.The influence of the earlier earthquakes (1968-1976) on the 1979 Koli-Buniabad earthquakes indicates that the eastern section of the Dasht-e Bayaz segment prompted (1979.11.27, Koli-Buniabad earthquake) into the failure regime by showing a positive increase (0.2 –0.4 bar) in coulomb stress.To validate the Coulomb stress calculations, we plotted the earthquakes after the main shocks on each stress changes map, and good correlations between the main shock stress changes and the spatial pattern of the seismicity were observed at the terminate part of strike slip faults. Moreover, geomorphic evidences such as, eroded earthquake scarps, displacement of channel, castle trace on ancient hills and displacement of Qanate show several seismic activities of these faults.
Keywords
Earthquake Sequence
Triggering Effect
Coulomb Stress
Dasht-e Bayaz Fault
Lut Block
  1. Walker, R., Jackson, J., and Baker, C. (2004) Active faulting and seismicity of the Dasht-e-Bayaz region, eastern Iran. Geophys J. Int., 157, 265-282.
  2. Toda, S., Stein, R.S., Reasenberg, P.A., and Dieterich, J.H. (1998) Stress transferred by the M=6.5 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and ‎future earthquake probabilities. J. Geophy. Res., 103, 24543-24565.
  3. King, G.C.P., Stein, R.S., and Lin, J. (1994) Static ‎stress changes and the triggering of earthguakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 935-953.
  4. Stein, R.S., King, G.C.P., and Lin, J. (1992) Change in failure stress on the southern San Andreas fault system caused by the 1992 Magnitude = 7.4 Landers earthquake. Science, 258, 1328-1332.
  5. Steacy, S., Gomberg, J., and Cocco, M. (2005) Introduction to special section: stress transfer, earthquake triggering and time-dependent seismic hazard. J. Geophy. Res., 110(B5), B05S01. doi: 10.1029/2005JB003692.
  6. Steacy, S., Marsan, D., Nalbant, S.S., and McCloskey, J. (2004) Sensitivity of Static Stress Calculations to the Earthquake Slip Distribution. J. Geophy. Res., 109(B4), B04303, doi: 10.1029/2002JB002365.
  7. McCloskey, J., Nalbant, S.S., and Steacy, S. (2005) Indonesian earthquake: Earthquake risk from co-seismic stress. Nature, 434, 291.
  8. Sarkarinejad, Kh. and Ansari, Sh. (2014) The Coulomb stress change and sesimicity rate due to the 1990 Rudbar M 7.3 earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., doi: 10.1785/0120130314.
  9. Papadimitriou, E. (2002) Mode of strong earthquake recurrence in the central Ionian Islands (Greece): Possible triggering due to Coulomb stress changes generated by the occurrence of previous strong shocks. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92(8), 3293-3308.
  10. Maleki Asayesh, B. and Hamzehloo, H. (2015) The Coulomb Stress Changes Due to Rigan Earthquakes and its Aftershocks. Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering, 2(2), 1-10 (in Persian).
  11. Sorkhvandi, S., Zafarian, H., and Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2015) Effect of Coulomb Stress Changes on Time-Dependent Model in East of Iran. Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering, 2(4), 1-10 (in Persian).
  12. Stein, R.S., Barka, A.A., and Dieterich, J.H. (1997) Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake static stress triggering, Geophy. J. Int., 128, 594-604.
  13. Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L., and Mouthereau, F. (2005) Convergence history across Zagros (Iran): constraints from collisional and earlier deformation, Int. J. Earth. Sci., 94, 401-419.
  14. Jackson, J.A. and Mckenzie, D.P. (1984) Active tecnonics of the Alpine-Himalayan belt between Turkey and Pakistan. Geophys. J. R. Aster. Soc., 77, 185-264.
  15. Chu, D. and Gordon, R.G. (1998) Current plate motions across the Red Sea. Geophys. J. Int., 135, 313-328.
  16. DeMets, C., Gordon, R., Argus, D.F., and Stein, S. (1994) Effects of recent revisions to the geomagnetic time scale on estimates of current plate motion. Geophy. Res. Let., 21, 2191-2194.
  17. Jackson, J.A., Haines, J., and Holt, W. (1995) The accommodation of Arabia-Eurasia ‎Plate convergence in Iran. J. Geophy. Res., 100(B8), 15205-15219.
  18. Vernant, Ph., Nilforoushan, F., Hatzfeld, D., Abassi, M.R., Vigny,C., Masson, F., Nankali, H., Martinod, J., Ashtiani, A., Bayer, R., Tavakoli, F., and Chery, J. (2004) Present-day crustal deformation and plate kinematics in the Middle East constrained by GPS measurements in Iran and Northern Oman. Geophy. J. Int., 157, 381-398.
  19. Meyer, B., and Le Dortz, K. (2007) Strike-slip kinematics in Central and Eastern Iran: estimating fault slip-rates averaged over the Holocene. Tectonics, 26(5), TC5009.
  20. Walker, R.T. and Khatib, M.M. (2006) Active faulting in the Birjand region of NE Iran. Tectonics, 25, TC4016, doi: 10.1029/2005TC001871.
  21. Walker, R., Jackson, J., and Baker, C. (2003) Thrust faulting in eastern Iran: source parameters and surface deformation of the 1978 Tabas and 1968 Ferdows earthquake sequences. Geophy. J. Int., 152, 749-765.
  22. Ambraseys, N.N. and Tchalenko, J.S. (1969) The Dasht-e-Bayaz (Iran) earthquake of August 31, 1968: a ï‌eld report. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., ‎59, 1751–179.
  23. Ambraseys, N.N. and Melville, C.P. (1982) A History of Persian Earthquakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Astronomical Soc., 77, 185-264.
  24. Berberian, M. and Yeats, R.S. (1999) Patterns of historical ‎earthquake ‎rupture ‎in the Iranian ‎ Plateau. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., ‎89, 120-139.
  25. Berberian, M. and Yeats, R.S. (2001) Contribution ‎of archaeologcal ‎data ‎to studies of earthquake history in the Iranian Plateau. J. Struct. Geol., 23, 563-584.
  26. Berberian, M., Jackson, J.A., Qorashi, M., Khatib, M.M., Priestly, K., Talebian, M., and Ghafori-Ashtiani, M. (1999) The 1997 May10 Zirkuh (Qaenat) ‎earthquake (M ‎7.1): faulting along the Sistan suture zone of eastern Iran. Geophy. J. Int., 136, 671-694.
  27. Walker, R.T., Bergman, E.A., Szeliga, W., and Fielding, E.J. (2011) Insights into the 1968-1997 Dasht-e-Bayaz and Zirkuh earthquake sequences, eastern Iran, from calibrated relocations, InSAR and high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophy. J. Int., 187, 1577-1603.
  28. Tchalenko, J.S. and Berberian, M. (1975) Dasht-e Bayaz Fault, Iran: Earthquake and related structures in bedrock. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 86, 703-709
  29. Haghipour, A. and Amidi, M. (1980) The November 14 to December 25, 1979 Ghaenat earthquakes of northeast Iran and their tectonic implications. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 70(5), 1751-1757.
  30. Khatib, M.M. and Walker, R. (2006) Paleoseismology evaluation of Dasht-e-bayaz fault using the morphotectonic evidence. 25th Symposium of Geoscience (GSI), Tehran.
  31. Stein, R.S. (2003) Earthquake Conversations. Scientific American, 288, 72-79.
  32. Okada, Y. (1992) Internal derofmation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., ‎82, 1018-1040.
  33. Toda, S., Stein, R.S., Sevilgen, V., and Lin, J. (2011) Coulomb 3.3 Graphic Rich Deformation and Stress-Change Software for Earthquake, Tectonic, and Volcano Research and Teaching-User Guide. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2011-1060.
  34. Deng, J. and Sykes, L.R. (1997) Stress evolution in southern California and triggering of ‎moderate-, small-, and micro size earthquakes. J. Geophy. Res., 102, ‎24411-24435.
  35. Stein, R. (1999) The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. Nature, 402, 605-609
  36. Toda, Sh. (2008) Coulomb stresses imparted by the 25 March 2007 Mw = 6.6 Noto-Hanto, Japan, earthquake explain its 'butterfly' distribution of aftershocks and suggest a heightened seismic hazard. Earth, Planets and Space, 60, 1041-1046.
  37. Harris, R. (1998) Introduction to special section: stress triggers, stress shadow, and implications for seismic hazard. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 24347–24358.
  38. Ma, K.F., Chan, C.H., and Stein, R.S. (2005) Response of seismicity to Coulomb stress triggers and shadows of the 1999 Mw = 7.6 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. J. Geophys. Res., 110, B05S19. doi:10.1029/2004JB003389
  39. Stein, R.S., Barka, A.A., and Dieterich, J.H. (1997) Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake static stress triggering. Geophy. J. Int., 128, 594-604.
  40. Walker, R.T., Bergman, E.A., Szeliga, W., and Fielding, E.J. (2011) Insights into the 1968–1997 Dasht-e-Bayaz and Zirkuh earthquake sequences, eastern Iran, from calibrated relocations, InSAR and high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophy. J. Int., 187, 1577-1603.
  41. Leonard, M. (2010) Earthquake fault scaling: self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average Displacement, and moment release. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., ‎100, 1971-1988.
  42. Baker, C. (1993) Active Seismicity and Tectonics of Iran. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  43. Jackson, J. (2001) Living with earthquakes: know your faults. J. Earthq. Eng., 5(1), 5-123.
  44. Wald, D.J. and Heaton, T.H. (1994) Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for 1992 Landers, California earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 84, 668-691.
  45. Ambraseys, N.N. and Tchalenko, J.S. (1968) Dasht-e-Bayaz, Iran, Earthquake of 31 August 1968. Nature, 220, 903-905.
  46. Niazi, M. (1968) Fault rupture in the Iranian (Dasht-e Bayaz) earthquake of August, 1968. Nature, 220, 569-570.
  47. Wells, D.L. and Coppersmith, K.J. (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 974-1002.
  48. Berberian, M. (1976) Contribution to the Seismotectonics of Iran (Part II). Report No 39, Geological Survey of Iran.
  49. Das, S. and Henry, C. (2003) Spatial relation between main earthquake slip and its aftershock distribution. Reviews of Geophysics, 41, doi: 10.1029/2002RG000119.
  50. Toda, S.R.S., Stein, P.A., Reasenberg, J.H., Dieterich, and Yoshida, A. (1998) Stress transferred by the 1995 Mw = 6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 24543-24565.
  51. Kilb, D., Gomberg, J., and Bodin, P. (2002) Aftershock triggering by complete Coulomb stress changes. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1-14.
  52. Utkucu, M., Durmus, H., Yalcın, H., Budakoglu, E., and Isık, E. (2013) Coulomb static stress changes before and after the 23 October 2011 Van, eastern Turkey, earthquake (MW = 7.1): implications for the earthquake hazard mitigation. Nat. Hazards Earth. Sys. Sci., 13, 1889-1902.
  53. Yadav, R.B.S., Gahalaut, V.K., Chopra, S., and Shan, B. (2012) Tectonic implications and seismicity triggering during the 2008 Baluchistan, Pakistan earthquake sequence. J. Asian Earth. Sci., 45, 167-178.
  54. Heidbach, O., Fuchs, K., Müller, B., Reinecker, J., Sperner, B., Tingay, M., and Wenzel, F. (2007) World stress map, WSM Release 2005, http://www.world-stress-map.org.
  55. Masson, F., Chery, J., Hatzfeld, D., Martinod, Vernant, P., Tavakoli, F. and GhaforyAshtiani, M. (2005) Seismic versus aseismic deformation in Iran inferred from earthquakes and geodetic data. Geophys. J. Int., 160, 217-226.
  56. Zarifi, Z., Nilfouroushan, F., and Raeesi, M. (2013) Crustal stress map of Iran: insight from seismic and geodetics computations. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171, 1219-1236.
  57. Bayer, C.K., Heuckroth, L.E., and Karim, R.I. (1969) An investigation of the Dasht-e Bayaz, Iran earthquake. ‎Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., ‎59, 1793-1822.

  • Receive Date 23 May 2017
  • Revise Date 24 February 2021
  • Accept Date 26 December 2020