Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Seismic Performance Assessment of Non-Structural Components by Different Approaches: Putra Interlocking Mortarless Wall

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 M.Sc Graduate of Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, Iran
Abstract
In recent years, interlocking mortarless masonry walls have been extensively implemented in different parts of the world as internal or external walls in buildings. Not only the interlocking system of these walls accelerates the speed of construction due to the self-aligning feature of bricks/blocks and the elimination of mortar layers but also reduces the need for skilled masons. These exceptional characteristics of interlocking walls have made them cost-effective and eco-friendly and led them to be a suitable replacement for typical masonry walls. Since the seismic performance of the interlocking systems has not been investigated sufficiently by researchers, studying and analyzing their behavior under seismic excitations is extremely vital for future construction. In this research, the seismic performance of an interlocking wall called “Putra” has been evaluated based on different approaches and using a 475-year return period earthquake spectrum of Standard 2800. Numerical three-dimensional micro-scale modeling has been utilized for accurate simulation of mortarless joints and interlocking blocks. After the validation process of numerical modeling in the ABAQUS finite element package, the in-plane load-carrying capacity of interlocking masonry walls subjected to combined vertical and lateral loadings has been conducted using nonlinear static analysis.
To consider the effect of different story levels, the amount of pre-compressive loads that are applied to masonry walls in different story levels of typical buildings has been considered as dead loads in the analyses (0.5 MPa for the first story, 0.25 MPa for the third story, and 0.1 MPa for the fourth story). The effective stiffness, ultimate strength, maximum displacement, dissipated energy, and ductility factor of the Putra interlocking wall under different vertical loads have been derived from bilinear graphs and discussed. Moreover, since the behavior factor of interlocking walls has not been evaluated in studies so far, the behavior factor of the Putra wall has been derived under different vertical loads for further calculations. Then, based on the Iranian seismic design code for non-structural components of buildings, the seismic performance of walls has been conducted using the elastic and inelastic spectra through the displacement-based and force-based methods. It was observed that according to the displacement-based method, 12 out of 24 cases were acceptable for construction, whereas according to the force-based method, 13 out of 24 cases were confirmed, and overall, only 8 cases got the acceptance for both methods. Results demonstrated that the seismic performance of interlocking mortarless walls strongly depends on the intensity of vertical load and inelastic response spectra. It also revealed that the interlocking Putra wall can be constructed in different seismic areas of Iran under 1 MPa pre-compressive stress. Since the 1 MPa vertical load is generally intense, it is recommended to use unreinforced Putra interlocking mortarless masonry walls in different story levels of a typical building (except the last story) in low seismicity areas of Iran. Additionally, the Putra interlocking walls can be constructed in different parts of Iran except in very-high seismic regions, provided that a three-story building has to be constructed on the story where the Putra interlocking walls have been situated. Totally, it is not recommended to use these walls in low-rise buildings; however, it seems that they can be utilized in lower stories of mid-rise buildings or in lower and middle stories of high-rise buildings.
Keywords

Subjects


Akbar, S., Gul, A., Khan, I. U., Haseeb, M., Shahzada, K., Khan, S. W., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Experimental assessment of retrofitted damaged mortarless dry stacked interlocking masonry walls. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 173, 108117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108117
Al-Fakih, A., & Al-Osta, M. (2022). Finite Element Analysis of Rubberized Concrete Interlocking Masonry under Vertical Loading. Materials, 15, 2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082858
Anand, K.B., & Ramamurthy, K. (2003). Laboratory-Based Productivity Study on Alternative Masonry Systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(3), 237-242. https://doi.org/doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:3(237)
Casapulla, C., Mousavian, E., Argiento, L., Ceraldi, C., & Bagi, K. (2021). Torsion-shear behaviour at the interfaces of rigid interlocking blocks in masonry assemblages. Experimental investigation and analytical approaches. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-296134/v1
Dehghani, E., & Mousavi, S. O. (2016). Study of the modification factor of concrete bridges with Elastomeric Rubber Bearing (ERB) and Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB). Civil Infrastructure Researches, 2(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.22091/cer.2015.750
Doran, B., Karslioglu, M., Aslan, Z., & Vatansever, C. (2022). Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Unreinforced Masonry Walls with and without Opening. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2022.2080611
Dorji, S., Derakhshan, H., Thambiratnam, D. P., Zahra, T., & Mohyeddin, A. (2023). Behaviour and material properties of versaloc semi-interlocking mortarless masonry. Materials and Structures, 56(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02102-2
Gul, A., Alam, B., Khan, I. U., Shah, S. A. A., Khan, S. W., & Shahzada, K. (2023). Improving seismic capacity of dry stacked interlocking masonry structure through confinement at corners. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 165, 107710. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107710
Jaafar, M., Alwathaf, A., Thanoon, W., Noorzaei, J., & Abdulkadir, M. (2006). Behaviour of interlocking mortarless block masonry. Construction Materials, 159, 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.2006.159.3.111
Kintingu, S. H. (2009). Design of Interlocking Bricks for Enhanced Wall Construction, Flexibility, Alignment Accuracy and Load Bearing. University of Warwick. https://books.google.com/books?id=AD8XjwEACAAJ
Magenes, G., & Calvi, G. M. (1997). In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 26(11), 1091-1112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199711)26:11<1091::AID-EQE693>3.0.CO;2-6
Moradi, N., Yazdani, M., & Hashemi, S. (2025). Numerical study of the seismic performance of interlocking mortarless masonry walls using the nonlinear static method. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 93, 147-164. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2025.93.2.147
Moradi, N., Yazdani, M., & Hashemi, S. J. (2024a). Nonlinear static analysis of Putra interlocking masonry wall using micro-modeling approach. 9th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering; SEE9, Tehran, Iran. 
Moradi, N., Yazdani, M., & Hashemi, S. J. (2024b). Seismic assessment of Putra interlocking masonry wall using pushover analysis. 9th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering; SEE9, Tehran, Iran. 
Moradi, N., Yazdani, M., Janbozorgi, F., & Hashemi, S. J. (2024). In-plane seismic performance of historical masonry walls with various brick bond patterns using micro-modeling approach. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(6), 4863-4876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01085-x
Nor, N. A., Jaafar, M., & Alwathaf, A. (2011). Structural Behavior of Mortarless Interlocking Load Bearing Hollow Block Wall Panel under Out-Of-Plane Loading. Advances in Structural Engineering, 14, 1185. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.14.6.1185
Safiee, N. A., Mohd Nasir, N. A., Ashour, A. F., & Abu Bakar, N. (2018). Behaviour of interlocking mortarless hollow block walls under in-plane loading. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 19(2), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2018.1433489
Standard No. 2800, t. e. Interpretation of "Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of building (Standard No. 2800, 4th edition)".
Xie, G., Zhang, X., Hao, H., Shi, T., Cui, L., & Thomas, J. (2023). Behaviour of reinforced mortarless interlocking brick wall under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 283, 115890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115890
Yazdani, M., & Zirakbash, M. (2024). Assessment of masonry arch bridges retrofitted by sprayed concrete under in-plane cyclic loading. Structural Monitoring and Maintenance, 11, 57-70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12989/smm.2024.11.1.057

  • Receive Date 17 June 2024
  • Revise Date 28 July 2024
  • Accept Date 21 August 2024