Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

A Study on Destroyed and Damaged Buildings in Zindajan Earthquakes; Case Study: Earthquake Affected Villages of Zindajan District, Herat Province-Fall 1402

Document Type : Technical Note

Authors
1 Dean of Engineering Faculty, Jami University, Herat, Afghanistan
2 Head of Civil Engineering Faculty, Jami University, Herat, Afghanistan
Abstract
The recent earthquakes in Herat city in the Zindajan district, occurred between October 7 and 15, with a series of tremors reaching a magnitude of 6.3. The hypocenter of these earthquakes was located in the Zindajan district of western Afghanistan, resulting in widespread destruction. These earthquakes and their aftershocks have left thousands of already-vulnerable populations living in underserved (white areas) in urgent need of humanitarian and health assistance. To date, nearly 43,400 people across this district have been directly affected, with almost 23% being children under the age of five. Significant damage has been reported in the area, with casualties including at least 2000 deaths and more than 2,500 injuries. As of October 19, aftershocks continue to occur, leaving communities in a state of fear and unease. Furthermore, over 3,330 homes have been completely destroyed, and extensive damage to infrastructure, including the water supply network, has been reported. This has forced many people to live in tents, open areas, and other temporary shelters. According to seismologists, the epicenters of these earthquakes were situated between the Siakhubulak Fault in the north and the Herat Fault in the south. According to satellite data from Sentinel-1A, an area measuring 30 km by 15 km, extending east to west around the location of these earthquakes, experienced uplift. Meanwhile, the satellite detected subsidence in a small area to the east of the uplifted zone. The seismologists added that the ground deformation was diffuse and inferred that the earthquakes were associated with a blind thrust fault. The fault responsible for the disaster is likely a structure located between the Herat and Siakhubulak faults. From a technical perspective, what is significant in the impacted area is the construction of buildings with steel and concrete structures, as well as houses made of earth and unreinforced materials that lack design considerations to withstand the forces of an earthquake. According to survey data from the affected villages in the Zindajan district, the buildings can be categorized into four types: steel structures, concrete structures, unreinforced structures, and houses built of earth. In this research, over 95 percent of houses built of earth were destroyed due to their insufficient strength to withstand seismic loads, resulting in the highest number of casualties. Unreinforced structures were identified as the second most vulnerable causing significant damage; however, fortunately, fewer roofs collapsed onto residents, thereby saving lives. The studied areas also included concrete and steel structures, some of which sustained serious damage, while a few managed to maintain their stability. This research examined the pathology of buildings and houses, as well as the causes of the damages. The findings from this study are presented below. The lack of proper monitoring and evaluation of constructed structures and buildings, particularly those lacking design and proper connections, has resulted in significant damage. A major issue in this disaster was not only the construction of earth-based structures but also other buildings that were not designed to withstand lateral and seismic loads. This deficiency led to the destruction and damage of most buildings during the first earthquake. The results show that despite experiencing four powerful earthquakes measuring above 6.2 on the Richter scale, steel structures, concrete structures, and even unreinforced structures collapsed far less frequently than earth-built houses. These more resilient structures maintained their stability and helped save human lives, according to the statistics. It has been said that if houses were built from earth instead of other materials, approximately 95 percent of causalities could be reduced.
Keywords

Subjects


American Concrete Institute. (2022). ACI Code-318-19: Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (Reapproved 2022).
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2016). ASCE/SEI 7-16: Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.
Buckle, I. G. (2000). Passive control of structures for seismic loads. Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2825.
Foroughi, M. (2017). Strengthening of existing adobe buildings or renovation of such buildings. National Conference on Strengthening of Yazd University. (In Persian)
Gernot, M. (2001). Construction manual for earthquake-resistant houses built of earth. Kassel University.
Iglesias, J. (1986). Repairing and strengthening of reinforced concrete buildings damaged in the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. In The Mexico Earthquake-1985: Factors involved and lessons learned (Proceedings of the International Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, September 19–21, 1986).
Shahmohammadi, P. (2004). Seismic strengthening of adobe buildings against earthquakes. The First National Conference on the Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings and Historical Structures, Shiraz, Shiraz Municipality. (In Persian)
Permanent Committee for Revisiting the Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistance. (2022). Iranian code of practice for seismic-resistant design of buildings (Standard No. 2800).
Rashidi, M. H., & Mehrabadi, A. A. (2007). Methods of strengthening and improving brick and masonry structures against earthquakes. Journal of Civil Engineering of Islamic Azad University. (In Persian)

  • Receive Date 20 November 2023
  • Revise Date 03 July 2024
  • Accept Date 09 July 2024