Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

The Role of Geopolymer Materials in Enhancing Building Resilience against Earthquakes

Document Type : Propagative Article

Author
Zahra sadat Hayatgheibi
Master's in Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Pardis Branch, Islamic Azad University, Pardis, Iran
10.48303/bese.2024.2026094.1155
Abstract
Iran, due to its geographical location and tectonic activity, is considered one of the most disaster-prone countries, frequently experiencing earthquakes and other natural hazards. The high risk of seismic events poses significant threats to buildings, infrastructure, and human lives, making resilience a crucial factor in construction and urban planning. The destructive nature of earthquakes has historically led to substantial financial and human losses, emphasizing the need for innovative approaches to enhance the durability and safety of structures. One of the most effective strategies to mitigate earthquake damage and improve resilience is the incorporation of lightweight and durable materials in building construction. Sustainable materials, particularly those designed for structural integrity and environmental compatibility, play a pivotal role in reducing disaster-related risks and improving long-term urban sustainability.
This study investigates the advantages of geopolymer materials as a promising alternative in lightweight construction, analyzing their role in enhancing structural resilience against seismic forces. Geopolymers represent a modern category of eco-friendly materials that offer significant benefits over traditional construction materials such as cement and concrete. These materials are produced through an innovative process that requires low energy consumption, resulting in reduced carbon emissions and enhanced mechanical properties. Unlike conventional cementitious materials, geopolymers exhibit exceptional durability, thermal stability, and resistance to chemical degradation, making them an ideal choice for earthquake-resistant construction.
The research adopts a descriptive-review methodology, synthesizing findings from domestic and international sources to evaluate the effectiveness of geopolymers in disaster-resilient construction. Studies have demonstrated that incorporating lightweight geopolymer-based solutions in structural design significantly reduces the overall weight of buildings, minimizing seismic forces exerted on structures during an earthquake. This characteristic not only enhances the stability of buildings but also improves post-disaster management. In the aftermath of earthquakes, buildings constructed with lightweight materials facilitate faster and more efficient debris removal, reducing casualties and expediting the community's recovery process. The ability to swiftly restore urban functions and minimize displacement plays a critical role in strengthening resilience and social sustainability.
In addition to improving seismic resilience, geopolymers contribute to environmental conservation and sustainable construction practices. The increasing concerns over air pollution, climate change, and excessive resource consumption have propelled the demand for eco-friendly building solutions. With the rapid urban expansion and population growth, reliance on sustainable construction materials becomes a necessity rather than an option. By implementing geopolymers in earthquake-resistant structures, cities can reduce their ecological footprint, minimize construction waste, and optimize resource utilization.
The findings of this study underscore the urgent need for adopting resilient construction methods, particularly in earthquake-prone regions. The integration of sustainable, lightweight, and durable materials is paramount to ensuring safety and mitigating disaster risks. As the frequency and intensity of natural disasters continue to rise, engineering solutions must align with modern advancements in material science to promote structural stability, environmental responsibility, and societal well-being. This research highlights the strategic benefits of geopolymers, reinforcing their significance in shaping future urban landscapes and fostering disaster-prepared communities.
Keywords
Resilience
Natural Disasters
Geopolymer Materials
Lightweight Materials

Subjects

Abbasian, A., Naqvi Dasht Bayaz, M., Kamalu, A., & Bazargan, A. M. (2017). An introduction to geopolymeric nanostructures. Iran Zeolite International Conference, Tehran (in Persian).
Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Rockström, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309, 1036-1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1112122
Achal, V., & Chin, C. S. (2021). "Building Materials for Sustainable and Ecological Environment."
Andersen, L. E., & Cardona, M. (2013). Building Resilience against Adverse Shocks: What are the Determinants of Vulnerability and Resilience? (Development Research Working Paper Series No. 1-21).
Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability, 5, 3328-3345.
Brown, L. R., Renner, M., & Halweil, B. (2003). "Vital Signs 2003: The Trends That Are Shaping Our Future." Worldwatch Institute.
Building Energy Data. (2008). Global energy consumption in the building sector. Retrieved from  www.buildingenergydata.org
Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., & Emrich, C. T. (2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1), 1-24.
Davis, I., & Aysan, Y. (1992). Disasters and the small dwelling-process, realism and knowledge: Towards an agenda for the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR). In Disasters and the Small Dwelling Conference, 8-22. James and James.
Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymer chemistry and applications. Saint-Quentin: Institut Géopolymère.
Esparham, A. (2022). Investigation of properties of geopolymers for use in sustainable materials. Basparesh, 24 (Articles in Press).
Feizbakhsh, M., & Noori, M. (2017). Contemporary Architecture of the West and Iran. Parseh Publishing (in Persian).
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 1-20.
Glasby, T., Day, J., Genrich, R., & Kemp, M. (2015). Commercial scale geopolymer concrete construction. The Saudi International Building and Constructions Technology Conference.
Habibi, K., Behzadfar, M., Meshkini, A., & Nazari, S. (2013). Preparation of a prediction model for the instability of ancient urban structures against earthquakes with inverted hierarchical logic and geographic information system. Journal of Geosciences, 83-92 (in Persian).
Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, 25-62.
ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability. (2013). *Resilient Cities 2013: Congress report*. ICLEI World Secretariat.
Kim, J. (2003). An Introduction to Sustainable Design. Translated by Nazli Debidian. Iranian Architecture Quarterly, No. 0.
Kamani-Fard, A., Hamdan Ahmad, M., & Remaz Ossen, D. (2012). The sense of place in the new homes of post-Bam earthquake reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 3(2), 220-236.
Kärrholm, M., Nylund, K., & de la Fuente, P. P. (2014). Spatial resilience and urban planning: Addressing the interdependence of urban retail areas. Cities, 36, 121-130.
Kutum, I., & Al-Jaberi, K. (2015). Jordan Banks Financial Soundness Indicators. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 4(1), 44-56.
Maddahi, M., Sayyadi, E., & Mohammadpour, A. (2012). Ketab-e Memari-ye Paydar [Book of Sustainable Architecture]. Lotus Publications.
Mandin, P. (2007). Commentary—Ethics and reflecting processes. Journal of Social Work Practice, 21(2), 235-238.
Marques, B.  & Loureiro, C.R. (2013). "Sustainable Architecture: Practices and Methods to Achieve Sustainability in Construction." International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 223-2226.
Moberg, F., & Hauge Simonsen, S. (2011). What is Resilience? An Introduction to Social-Ecological Research. Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Natural Disaster Research Institute. (2019). Supporting Report for the National Strategic Document on Management.
Norman, W. (2012). Adapting to Change: The Role of Community Resilience. Young Foundation.
Ottman, Osman. (2011). Green Architecture (Environmentally Friendly): Advanced Technologies and Materials.
Pir Atta, P., & Hosseini, M. (2013). Resilience in the construction industry and its effects on earthquake risk management. The Second International Conference on Architecture and Structures, Tehran (in Persian).
Saqi, H., & Mehrdadi, A. R. (2014). Geopolymer cement and its application in concrete. National Conference of New Materials and Structures (in Persian).
Schulz, C. N. (2015). The Concept of Dwelling: Toward an Analogical Architecture (6th Edition). Translated by M. Amir Yarahmadi. Tehran: Agah Publishing.
Wikström, A. (2013). The Challenge of Change: Planning for Social urban Resilience [Report].
Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21(2), 152-169.
Yoon, D. K. (2012). Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: A comparative study. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 823-843.
Zamora-Castro, S. A., Salgado-Estrada, R., Sandoval-Herazo, L. C., Melendez-Armenta, R. A., Manzano-Huerta, E., Yelmi-Carrillo, E., & Herrera-May, A. L. (2021). "Sustainable Development of Concrete through Aggregates and Innovative Materials: A Review." Applied Sciences, 11(2), 629.
Zandieh, S., & Parvardinejad, S. (2010). Fundamentals and Principles of Sustainable Architecture.

  • Receive Date 07 April 2024
  • Revise Date 23 July 2024
  • Accept Date 19 August 2024