Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Investigating Different Models for Calculating Columns Design Shear in Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames

Document Type : Review Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
4 Director of the Earthquake Engineering Department, Paydar Behtab Davam Consulting Engineers, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The desirable mechanism in reinforced concrete frames involves the formation of plastic flexural hinges in the beams, and if the columns yield, the hinges are also of the flexural type. In other words, in reinforced concrete frames, the ideal design of the columns is based on the flexural failure mode. To achieve this goal, all effective actions on column behavior must be considered. The methods for calculating the design shear of columns in the ACI318-19 standard have significant flaws that increase the probability of collapse in reinforced concrete moment frames. The results of laboratory and numerical studies on special moment frame systems indicate that the shear design of columns in spectral dynamic analysis is significantly lower than reality.
Additionally, the shear calculated from the mechanism of beams in the design of columns is completely incorrect and independent of the chosen method for distributing the flexural moments of the beams between the columns connected to the joint and should be avoided. However, the proposed methods for the shear design of the aforementioned columns are quite similar to the process of calculating the shear design of shear walls, which includes an over strength factor, a dynamic amplification factor, along with the effects of column positioning. In the design of columns, in addition to the mentioned coefficients, another important parameter that is not addressed in the ACI 318-19 standard is the phenomenon of elongation of reinforced concrete beams.
Due to the elongation of the beams, the maximum displacement occurs in the columns of the first story. This is because the bases of the first story columns are fixed to the foundation, and as the elongation of the beams, the lower supports of the first story columns cannot displace the foundation. Consequently, this causes movement in the upper part of the columns, resulting in a significant rotation in the exterior columns of the first story. The position of the columns is also very important in calculating the design shear force. Exterior columns on the first floor experience a significant shear difference compared to other columns due to the phenomenon of elongation of reinforced concrete beams, which necessitates the use of a column mechanism in their design shear calculations. The failure to apply the mentioned factors in conventional structural designs leads to a change in the failure mode of columns from flexural to flexural-shear or even shear, affecting the overall behavior of the structure and the design assumptions.
According to ASCE 7-22, the use of intermediate reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame is prohibited throughout Iran. The Chinese reinforced concrete building standard GB 50011-2010 limits the maximum allowable height of special reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame systems in very high intensity of seismicity to 24 meters. In this paper, using various standards and research by other researchers, computational approaches for shear design of reinforced concrete columns in moment frames are investigated, and the accuracy of each model is compared with numerical and experimental results, and necessary suggestions are provided. The high shear value in columns probably makes the use of modern materials, including high-strength reinforcement, inevitable in the design and retrofitting of reinforced concrete moment frames.
Keywords
Subjects

AGENCY, F. E. M. (2015). (ATC-78-3) Seismic Evaluation of Older Concrete Frame Buildings for Collapse Potential. https://www.scribd.com/document/ 332260081/ATC-78-3-Methodology-Concrete-Frames-083115
AIJ. (2004). AIJ - Japan Standard Concrete Building. Japan Standard.
American Concrete Institute. (2025). (ACI 318-25) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. https://www.concrete.org/store/productdetail.aspx?ItemID=318U19&Language=English&Units=US_Units
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2022). (ASCE 7-22) Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. https://sp360.asce.org/ PersonifyEbusiness/Merchandise/Product-Details/productId/276865145
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2023). (ASCE 41-23) Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. https://sp360.asce.org/personifyebusiness/ Merchandise/Product-Details/productId/309658028
Center, P. E. E. R. (2010). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Center, P. E. E. R. (2017). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
code, T. b. s. d. (2018). TBDY (2018) Turkish Building Seismic Design Code. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement.
Deierlein, G. G., Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., & Kircher, C. A. (2008). ATC 63 methodology for evaluating seismic collapse safety of archetype buildings. In Structures Congress 2008: Crossing Borders.
China Academy of Building Research. (2010). (GB 50011-2010) National Standard of the People's Republic of China Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. https://iisee.kenken.go.jp/ worldlist/10_China/China%20GB50011-2010%20(in%20English).pdf
Eurocode 8. (2004). Eurocode 8 - Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. https://doi.org/10.31030/ 3350744
Fenwick, R., Bull, D. K., & Gardiner, D. (2010). Assessment of Hollow-Core Floors for Seismic Performance.
Fenwick, R., & Megget, L. (1993). Elongation and load deflection characteristics of reinforced concrete members containing plastic hinges. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 26(1), 28-41.
Galanis, P. H., & Moehle, J. P. (2015). Development of collapse indicators for risk assessment of older-type reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 31(4), 1991-2006.
Haselton, C. B. (2006). Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Buildings. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.
Haselton, C. B., & Deierlein, G. G. (2007). Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Buildings. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
Haselton, C. B., Liel, A. B., & Deierlein, G. G. (2008). Example evaluation of the ATC-63 methodology for reinforced concrete special moment frame buildings. In Structures Congress 2008: Crossing Borders.
Kim, J. H., Choi, S.-H., Han, S.-J., Hwang, J.-H., Jeong, H., & Kim, K. S. (2023). Effect of beam elongation phenomenon on lateral load resistance of   RC frame. Journal of Building Engineering, 65, 105764.
Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., & Deierlein, G. G. (2008). Comparing seismic collapse safety of modern and existing reinforced concrete frame structures in California. In Structures Congress 2008: Crossing Borders.
McBride, A. P. (1995). Elongation of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Units with and without Slab. Masters thesis, University of Auckland.
Moehle, J. P. (2015). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. 814, McGraw-Hill Education.
Moehle, J. P., Hooper, J. D., & Lubke, C. D. (2016). (NIST GCR16-917-40) Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Frames. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. (2010). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. (2017). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings.
Peng, B. H., Dhakal, R. P., Fenwick, R. C., & Carr, A. J. (2011a). Elongation of plastic hinges in ductile RC members: Model development. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 9(3), 315-326.
Peng, B. H., Dhakal, R. P., Fenwick, R. C., & Carr, A. J. (2011b). Elongation of plastic hinges in ductile RC members: Model verification. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 9(3), 327-338.
Peng, B. H., Dhakal, R. P., Fenwick, R. C., Carr, A. J., & Bull, D. K. (2013). Multispring hinge element for reinforced concrete frame analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(4), 595-606.
Pettinga, J. D., & Priestley, M. N. (2005). Dynamic behaviour of reinforced concrete frames designed with direct displacement-based design. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(spec02), 309-330.
REGION, A. A. P. F. S. A. A. D. O. T. B. L. I. T. L. A. (2023). (LATBSDC) Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council. https://drive.google.com/ file/d/1cBv7S4Eh_c8IoPtrch7uxIHP9FbQELO_/view?pli=1
Security, F. E. M. A. o. t. U. S. D. o. H. (2020). NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. https://www.nibs.org/files/pdfs/ FEMA_P-2082-1__2020-nehrp-pr.pdf
Shahrooz, B. M., & Moehle, J. P. (1987). Experimental Study of Seismic Response of RC Setback Buildings. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
Sönmez, E., & Rodriguez, M. E. (2024). Frame buildings are not an answer for earthquakes: The case of the February 2023 earthquakes in Türkiye. Earthquake Spectra, 40(4), 2364-2382.
Standards New Zealand. (2006). (NZS 3101) New Zealand Concrete Standard. https://www.standards. govt.nz/shop/nzs-3101-1-and-22006-inc-a1-a2-a3
Unal, M. E., Abdullah, S. A., Kolozvari, K., Wallace, J. W., & Kajiwara, K. (2023). Evaluation of ACI 318-19 provisions for special moment frames and special structural walls using data from the E-Defense 10-story tests. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 21(15), 6699-6721.
Visnjic, T. (2014). Design Considerations for Earthquake-Resistant Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Frames. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Visnjic, T., Panagiotou, M., & Moehle, J. (2017). Estimating seismic shear in columns of RC special moment frames. In 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
Wuu, P. J.-y. (1996). Deformations in Plastic Hinge Zone of R/C Beam in Ductile Frame Structures Subjected to Inelastic Cyclic Loading. Masters thesis, University of Auckland.

  • Receive Date 28 August 2024
  • Revise Date 20 February 2025
  • Accept Date 22 February 2025