A Numerical Investigation on the Behavior of RC Columns with Spiral Stirrups

Document Type : Research Note

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student of Structure, Department of Civil Engineering, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

In recent years, the use of helical screws in reinforced concrete components has been developed. Practical results of these experiments have shown that spiral reinforcement (SR) has improved seismic performance compared to other conventional methods. Experience has shown that by applying torsion in concrete members, due to the principal tensile stresses in the diameter of each element, the member elements of torsional structures with spiral patterns will expand. Due to the design of the expansion of torsional cracks in the cross-section, these cracks are relatively ideally perpendicular to the cross-section of the torsion reinforcement. The research results so far clearly show that the use of rectangular helical bolts increases the bearing capacity. Also, in this method, with a constant ratio of transverse reinforcement, the ductility condition is improved compared to conventional bends in workshops. Finally, the use of helical reinforcement in structural members increases the shear, flexural and axial strength. Commonly used braces require two end hooks to support the anchor. For the length of these two hooks, a large amount of steel material is needed for each closing brace, which increases the weight and price of the steel. This process is not required, and this type of reinforcement reduces the weight of the steel and saves money due to the reduction of steel consumption compared to conventional braces. The effect of SR on the formation of cracks and the member's behaviour after cracks has also been tested.
According to the researches, it is observed that so far, the effect of continuous closures as well as the effect of changing different parameters in the enclosure in columns with a square cross-section with continuous rebars has not been done. Regarding the confinement of concrete members with reinforcement, considering the cases mentioned about the importance and role of transverse struts in the performance of structural components, the purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of helical reinforcement in comparison with conventional transverse reinforcements in square reinforced concrete columns.  Also, the effect of changing various parameters such as yield stress of reinforcements (high-strength steel with normal strength), cross-section reinforcement and cross-sectional column dimensions on behavioral performance, including load-bearing capacity and ductility, in columns with this type of arch and analysis. In this study, the finite element analysis method has been used. The results show that the capacity and ductility of the column enclosed by the winding is higher than that of the column retained by the conventional tension. Also, in the column held by the twist, the column withstands less stress after loading, so it can be said less damage in this column will be obtained. In the load-displacement curves drawn for the column, at the beginning of the vertical branch up to a certain load, the behaviour of the columns is the same. Until the peak is reached, the stiffness decreases with increasing stiffness, and in the area after the apex, the softening behaviour increase. As the spacing of the bolts and the pitch of the windings increases, the behaviour of the columns in the two modes becomes closer to each other. It shows a relatively similar behaviour, and the difference in their capacity also becomes much smaller. Ductility is also reduced. Increasing the pitch of the windings has a greater effect on the capacity of the column than increasing the distance of the windings. By increasing the distance of the turns, the capacity of the column enclosed by the tortoise decreases sharply. However, in these conditions, the column enclosed by the tortoise performs better than the column enclosed by the arch. The results show that by increasing the cross-sectional dimensions of the column, the rebars withstand less stress, and the column capacity also increases. Also, keeping the number of rebars constant and increasing the cross-sectional dimensions to a certain extent increases the capacity, and then increasing the dimensions without increasing the number of rebars does not have much effect on the column capacity. The results show that with the increasing yield stress of the rebars, the capacity of the column has increased. Increasing the strength of the rebars reduces the stress in the concrete, resulting in less damage.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Liang, C.-Y., Chen, C.-C., Weng, C.-C., Yin, SY.-L., and Wang, J.-C. (2014) Axial compressive behavior of square composite columns confined by multiple spirals. Constr. Steel Res., 103, 230-40, doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.09.006.
  2. Azimi, M., Adnan, A., Bin Tahir M.M., Sam, ARBM., and Razak, SMBSA. (2015) Seismic performance of ductility classes medium RC beam-column connections with continuous rectangular spiral transverse reinforcements. Am. J. Solids Struct., 12, 787-807.
  3. Shih, T.-H., Chen, C.-C., Weng, C.-C., Yin, SY.-L., and Wang, J.-C. (2013) Axial strength and ductility of square composite columns with two interlocking spirals. Constr. Steel. Res., 90, 184-92, doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.021.
  4. Vanagas, E., Kliukas, R., and Lukoševičienė, O. (2017) Strength of Circular Concrete Columns Reinforced with FRP Bars and Spirals. Procedia Eng., 172, 1220-1226, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017. 02.143.
  5. Saatcioglu, M. and Razvi, S.R. (1992) Strength and Ductility of Confined Concrete. Struct. Eng., 118, 1590-607, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118: 6(1590).
  6. Sheikh, S.A. and Toklucu, M.T. (1993) Reinforced concrete columns confined by circular spirals and hoops. ACI Struct. J., 90, 542.
  7. Tsitotas, M.A. and Tegos, L.A. (1970) Seismic behaviour of R/C columns and beams with interlocking spirals. WIT Trans. Built. Environ., 23.
  8. Li, Q. and Belarbi, A. (2011) Seismic Behavior of RC Columns with Interlocking Spirals under Combined Loadings Including Torsion. Procedia Eng., 14, 1281-1291, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07. 161.
  9. Belarbi, A., Prakash, S., and You, Y.-M. (2009) Effect of spiral reinforcement on flexural-shear-torsional seismic behavior of reinforced concrete circular bridge columns. Eng. Mech., 33, 137-58.
  10. Prakash, S., Belarbi, A., and You, Y.-M. (2010) Seismic performance of circular RC columns subjected to axial force, bending, and torsion with low and moderate shear. Eng. Struct., 32, 46-59, doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.014.
  11. Mizugami, Y. (2000) Efficiency of lateral reinforcement in interlocking spirals rebar. 16th US-Japan Bridg Eng. Workshop, 265-76.
  12. Karayannis, C.G. and Chalioris, C.E. (2013) Shear tests of reinforced concrete beams with continuous rectangular spiral reinforcement. Constr. Build Mater., 46, 86-97, doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013. 04.023.
  13. Eom, T.-S., Kang, S.-M., Park, H.-G., Choi, T.-W., and Jin, J.-M. (2014) Cyclic loading test for reinforced concrete columns with continuous rectangular and polygonal hoops. Struct., 67, 39-49, doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.023.
  14. Seręga, S. (2015) Effect of transverse reinforcement spacing on fire resistance of high strength concrete columns. Fire Safety Journal, 71, 150-61, doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.11.017.
  15. Mas, B., Cladera, A., and Ribas, C. (2016) Experi-mental study on concrete beams reinforced with pseudoelastic Ni-Ti continuous rectangular spiral reinforcement failing in shear. Eng. Struct., 127, 759-68, doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.022.
  16. Saha, P. and Meesaraganda, L.V. (2019) Experi-mental investigation of reinforced SCC beam-column joint with rectangular spiral reinforcement under cyclic loading. Constr. Build , 201, 171-85, doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat. 2018.12.192.
  17. Azimi, M., Campos, U.A., Matthews, J.C., Lu, H., Tehrani, F.M., Sun, S., et al. (2020) Experimental and numerical study of cyclic performance of reinforced concrete exterior connections with rectangular-spiral reinforcement. Struct. Eng., 146, 04019219, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002506.
  18. Kheyroddin, A., Khatami, M., and Sharifi, M. (2014) Investigation of the performance of rectangular and polygonal continuous stirrups in reinforced concrete columns. Third Natl. Conf. New Mater. Struct. Civ. Eng., Semnan, Semnan Univ.
  19. Haji, M., Naderpour, H., and Kheyroddin, A. (2018) Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns with FRP, Using Wrapping, Near-surface Mounted and Combined Methods. Transp. Infrastruct. Eng., 3, 33-48.
  20. Naderpour, H., Nagai, K., Fakharian, P., and Haji, M. (2019) Innovative models for prediction of compressive strength of FRP-confined circular reinforced concrete columns using soft computing methods. Struct., 215, 69-84, doi:10.1016/ j.compstruct.2019.02.048.
  21. Otsuka, H., Takeshita, E., Yabuki, W., Wang, Y., Yoshimura, T., and Tsunomoto, M. (2004) Study on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns subjected to torsional moment, bending moment and axial force. 13th World Conf. Earthq. Eng.
  22. ACI committee 318 (2011) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. ACI 318-11.
  23. Richart, F.E., Brandtzæg, A., and Brown, R.L. (1929) Failure of Plain and Spirally Reinforced Concrete in Compression. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, College of Engineering. Engineering Experiment Station.
  24. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. (2012) Abaqus Theory Manual, Version 6.12. Providence, RI, USA. n.d.
  25. Habibpour, M. and Farahbod, F. (2016) Strengthening of RC columns using multi directional FRP composites. Semi-Annually Journal of Concrete Research, 8(2), 101-115 (in Persian).