Effect of Ground Slope on the Dynamic Response of Piles Group in Liquefiable Soil based on 3D Numerical Simulation

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Engineering and Technology, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Abstract

1.Introduction

During the past earthquakes, liquefaction and the resulting deformations have caused significant damage to the deep foundations of bridges, ports, offshore structures and buildings that these damages have been more severe in mildly sloping grounds due to lateral spreading-induced liquefaction. Lateral spreading-induced soil liquefaction, has imposed significant damage to the deep foundations of bridges, ports, offshore structures and buildings. The behavior of piles in liquefied soil has been investigated by various researchers using field observations, large-scale (1-g) shake table tests, centrifuge tests as well as numerical simulations. Despite various experimental, numerical and field studies by previous researchers, there is also no comprehensive approach to assessing the effects of lateral spreading on pile groups. On the other hand, numerical simulations are an economical tool for investigating and a means of representing the seismic performance of the pile groups at sites with liquefaction-induced lateral spreading.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of various pile groups (e.g., 1×1, 2×2 and 3×3) on reducing the potential for liquefaction during earthquake are investigated parametrically, applying three-dimensional finite element (FE) simulations using OpenSees software. To examine the ground inclination angle and array of pile groups' effects, different models have been subjected to the El Centro earthquake (1940). This study evaluates the effect of each of these factors on soil acceleration, lateral displacement, excess pore pressure and piles bending moment. The numerical model has been verified and calibrated in the literature through analysis of a well-documented large-scale (1-g) shake-table test.

2.Numerical Simulations

To gain insight into the effect of ground inclination angle on various pile groups in 10-m-thick mildly inclined liquefiable soil above the bedrock (Figure 5). The physical and mechanical properties of the soil layers and the pile respectively, are presented in Tables (1) and (2). Also, all the models in this study have been subjected to the El Centro earthquake (1940) (shown in Figure 9) with 0.15 g scaled peak ground acceleration.

3.Results and discussions

To investigate the effect of the ground inclination angle on the generation and dissipation of pore water pressure, the time history of excess pore water pressure for various pile groups in depths of 6 m is shown in Figure (18). According to Figure (18), as the ground inclination angle increases, the excess pore water pressure disappears sooner, which is due to the increasing effect of the dilatancy phenomenon.
Figure (20) shows time history of the pile head lateral displacement for different ground of the slopes (af = 0° to 6°) in the pile group 1×1- 2×2 - 3×3. According to Figure (20) in the initial seconds of the excitation due to the lack of soil liquefaction, the ground of the slope has a little effect on the lateral displacement of the piles but with the occurrence of liquefaction and reduction of soil shear strength, it is observed that with increasing slope, the lateral displacement of piles increases severely. It is also observed that in the horizontal model, the maximum lateral displacement of the pile head occurs in about 2 seconds, which corresponds to the maximum acceleration time of the El Centro earthquake. While in mildly sloping ground due to the increase of lateral pressure from the soil, the maximum deformation occurs at the end of the earthquake and causes permanent displacement in the piles.

4.Conclusions

The main important conclusions drawn from present study are as follows:

1. Based on the results, with increasing the ground slope angle in a specified point of the soil, less pore water pressure is produced and the dissipation of pore water pressure starts earlier, but the variations of pore water pressure increased.
2. In mildly sloping ground, the amount of pore water pressure in downslope is less than upslope ground and also with increasing ground slope angle, the rate fluctuations of excess pore water pressure increased in the down-slope of the pile group. This behavior is due to the high displacement downslope soil relative to upslope soil in the pile group.
3. In mildly sloping ground, despite the reduction of pore water pressure, lateral displacement of piles and soil severely increased. The reason for this contradiction due to the direction of static shear stress is parallel to the direction of soil slope. This shear stress is due to the weight of the soil mass, which increases the displacement of piles and soil in mildly sloping ground.

At the last, it should be noted that, the ground slope angle is a very effective parameter in the lateral and vertical displacement of piles that should be considered in design code. 

Keywords


  1. Chaloulos, Y.K., Bouckovalas, G.D., and Karamitros,K. (2013) Pile response in submerged lateral spreads: common pitfalls of numerical and physical modeling techniques. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 55, 275-287.
  2. Fallahzadeh, M., Haddad, A., and Jafarian, Y. (2019) Seismic performance of end-bearing piled raft with countermeasure strategy against liquefaction using centrifuge model tests. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17(11), 5929-5961.
  3. Su, L., Wan, H.P., Abtahi, Sh., Li, Y., and Ling, X.Z. (2020) Dynamic response of soil–pile–structure system subjected to lateral spreading: shaking table test and parallel finite element simulation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 57(4), 497-517.
  4. He, L., Elgamal, A., Abdoun, T., Abe, A., Dobry, R., Hamada, M., Menses, J., Sato, M., Shantz T., and Tokimatsu, K. (2009) Liquefaction-induced lateral load on pile in a medium Dr Sand layer. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(7), 916-938.
  5. He, L., Ramirez, J., Lu, J., Tang, L., Elgamal, A.E., and Tokimatsu, K. (2017) Lateral spreading near deep foundations and influence of soil permeability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54(6), 846-861.
  6. Dobry, R., Thevanayagam, S., Medina, C., Bethapudi, R., Elgamal, A., Bennett, V., Abdoun, T., Zeghal, M., El Shamy, U., and Mercado, V.M. (2011) Mechanics of lateral spreading observed in a full-scale shake test. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(2), 115-129.
  7. Kavand, A., Haeri, S.M., Asefzadeh, A., Rahmani, I., Ghalandarzadeh, A., and Bakhshi, A. (2014) Study of the behavior of pile groups during lateral spreading in medium dense sands by large scale shake table test. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(3), 186-203.
  8. Motamed, R., Sesov, V., Towhata, I., and Tuan Anh, N. (2010) Experimental modeling of large pile groups in sloping ground subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral flow: 1-G shaking table tests. Soils and Foundations, 50(2), 261-279.
  9. Motamed, R., Towhata, I., Honda, T., Tabata, K., and Abe, A. (2013) Pile group response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: E-Defense large shake table test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 51, 35-46.
  10. Haeri, S.M., Kavand, A., Rahmani, I., and Torabi, H. (2012) Response of a group of piles to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading by large scale shake table testing. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 38, 25-45.
  11. Abdoun, T. Dobry, R. O’Rourke, T.D., and Goh, S.H. (2003) Pile response to lateral spreads: centrifuge modeling. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(10), 869-878.
  12. Gonzalez, M.A. (2008) Centrifuge Modeling of Pile Foundation Response to Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading: Study of Sand Permeability and Compressibility Effects Using Scaled Sand Technique. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
  13. Toyota, H., Towhata, I., Imamura, S.-I., and Kudo, K.-I. (2004) Shaking table tests on flow dynamics in liquefied slope. Soils and Foundations, 44(5), 67-84.
  14. Ghasemi-Fare, O. and A. Pak, (2016) Numerical investigation of the effects of geometric and seismic parameters on liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 89, 233-247.
  15. Asgari, A., M. Oliaei, and M. Bagheri, (2013) Numerical simulation of improvement of a liquefiable soil layer using stone column and pile-pinning techniques. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 51, 77-96.
  16. Asgari, A., Ranjbar, F., and Akbarzadeh Bengar, H. (2020) Using pile group to mitigate lateral spreading in uniform and stratified liquefiable sand strata: three dimensional numerical simulation. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, Accepted (in Persian).
  17. Elgamal, A., Lu, J., and Forcellini, D. (2009) Mitigation of liquefaction-induced lateral deformation in a sloping stratum: Three-dimensional numerical simulation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(11), 1672-1682.
  18. Huang, D., Wang, G., and Jin, F. (2020) Effectiveness of pile reinforcement in liquefied ground. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 24(8), 1222-1244.
  19. Jeremic, B. (2001) Development of geotechnical capabilities in OpenSees. Citeseer.
  20. Mazzoni, S., et al. (2006) OpenSees command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, 264.
  21. Mroz, Z. (1967) On the description of anisotropic workhardening. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 15(3), 163-175.
  22. Elgamal, A., Yang, Z., and Parra, E. (2002) Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(4), 259-271.
  23. Biot, M.A. (1962) Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. Journal of Applied Physics, 33(4), 1482-1498.
  24. Chan, A., H.-C. (1988) A Unified Finite Element Solution to Static and Dynamic Problems of Geomechanics. Swansea University.
  25. Zienkiewicz, O., Chan, A., Pastor, M., Paul, D., and Shiomi, T. (1990) Static and dynamic behaviour of soils: a rational approach to quantitative solutions. I. Fully saturated problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 429(1877), 285-309.
  26. Yang, Z., Elgamal, A., Adalier, K., and Sharp, M.K. (2004) Earth dam on liquefiable foundation and remediation: numerical simulation of centrifuge experiments. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(10), 1168-1176.
  27. Yang, Z., Lu, J., and Elgamal, A. (2008) Opensees Soil Models and Solid-Fluid Fully Coupled Elements User’s Manual.
  28. Klar, A., Frydman, S., and Baker, R. (2004) Seismic analysis of infinite pile groups in liquefiable soil. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(8), 565-575.
  29. Law, H.K. and Lam, I.P. (2001) Application of periodic boundary for large pile group. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(10), 889-892.