Database of the Strong Ground Motion Near-Fault of Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 M.Sc., Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Historical background attention to seismic events in the near-field ground motion goes back to the Parkfield (1966) and San Fernando (1971) earthquakes. In fact, the occurrence of earthquakes and the concentrated presence of population centers in earthquake- stricken areas have further clarified the destructive nature of seismic events in near-fault area for structural and earthquake engineers. Recognition and collection of recorded data from earthquakes in the near-fault area that have different effects can be effective in reducing damage to structures and can also be used in seismological studies and engineering research; therefore, forming a Database of  the near-field ground motions is necessary and vital. The most important effects of strong ground motion in the near-field are   long-period pulses due to the rupture directivity effect in the vicinity of the earthquake source, which appears   mainly in the direction perpendicular to the fault and in a short time, apply a lot of energy to the structure.
In this study, the near-field records of Iranian earthquakes to evaluate the status of pulses long-period have been investigated. The studied seismic database includes 450 events of recorded earthquakes in Iran, which have been recorded and stored since the establishment of the Iran strong motion network until 2014.
All of the selected earthquakes have characteristics of magnitude, epicentral distance, geological characteristics (soil type), location of accelerometer, date and time of event, focal depth, maximum ground surface acceleration, maximum ground surface velocity, and maximum ground surface displacement. It should be noted that the moment magnitude of all selected events is equal to a value between 5 and 7, and their epicentral distance is less than 30 km from the event location.
Near-field records have been separated from other data due to their Forward Directivity and pulses long-period, and a total of 77 records of near-fault strong ground motion were identified with Forward Directivity.
The selected data have the special characteristics of near-fault records that have pulses in the acceleration or velocity time history record, and their characteristics include a short period of strong ground motion, rupture directivity effects, and low-frequency pulses in velocity time history. The selected data in this study have the characteristics and values that have been mentioned, so it is possible that there are other data that have the characteristics of near-fault records and have long-period pulses in the earthquake record and at a distance of more than 30 km or outside from the moment magnitude range of 5-7.
In general, the result of this research has led to the preparation of the database of the near-fault with the country's pulse-like records from the beginning of its establishment (in 1973 using the SMA1 analog accelerometer) until 2014 of the Iran strong motion network of the research center of the Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. The database collected in 60 stations (77 records) has provided comprehensive and reliable information about parameters such as moment magnitude, epicenter distance, focal depth, soil type, Predominant Period (Tp), Endurance Time. This database can be used as a reference to be used in projects, reports and researches of students at different levels of education, technical and engineering offices and companies, seismic hazard analysis studies, earthquake engineering projects and researches that require the use of near-field ground motion in Iran. The use of this refined database for the design of important structures in addition to the development of earthquake engineering knowledge is very important

Keywords


  1. Building and Housing Research Center (2008) Iran's Strong Motion Network Monthly. Fourth Year, No. 47 (in Persian).
  2. Farzanegan, A., Pour Mohammad Shahvar, M., and Mirzaei-Alawijeh, H. (2017) Four Decades of Accelerometry in Iran, Tehran. Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center (in Persian).
  3. Hutchings, L., Ioannidou, E., Foxall, W., Voulgaris, N., Savy, J., Kalogeras, I., Scognamiglio, L., and Stavrakakis, G. (2007) A physically based strong ground-motion prediction methodology, application to PSHA and the 1999 Mw = 0 Athens earthquake. Geophys. J. Int., 168(2), 659-680.

 

  1. Alavi, B. and Krawinkler, H. (2001) Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motions on Frame Structures. A Report of the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, California, Report No. 138.
  2. Mavroeidis, G.P. and Papageorgiou, A.S. (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(3), 1099-1131.
  3. Stewart, J.P., Chiou, Sh-J., Bray, J.D., Graves, R.W., Somerville, P.G., and Abrahamson, N.A. (2001) Ground Motion Evaluation Procedures for Performance-Based Design. A report on research conducted under grant no. EEC-9701568 from the National Science Foundation, PEER.
  4. Ramzi, H.R. (1997) Basic Accelerograms Data of Iran Strong Motion Network, Tehran. Building and Housing Research Center, Journal No. 256, 126 Pages (in Persian).
  5. Kale, O., Akkar, S., Ansari, A., and Hamzehloo, (2015) A ground-motion predictive model for Iran and Turkey for horizontal PGA, PGV, and     5% damped response spectrum: investigation of possible regional effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(2A), 963-980.
  6. Saffari, H., Kuwata, Y., Takada, S., and Mahdavian, (2012) Updated PGA, PGV, and spectral acceleration attenuation relations for Iran. Earthquake Spectra, 28(1), 257-276.
  7. Mirzaei Alavijeh, H., Sinaian, F., and Farzanegan, A. (2011) Study of Strong Ground Motion Parameters from January 1990 to December 1995 (1991-1995) with Accelerometer and Seismography Data and Database Development, Tehran. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Building and Housing Research Center, 171 pages (in Persian).
  8. Mirzaei Aluwijeh, H., Sinaian, F., and Farzanegan, A. (2009) Study of Strong Ground Motion Parameters (2003-2005) with Accelerometer and Seismography Data and Database Development. Building and Housing Research Center, Research Report Publication Number: G-510, First Edition (in Persian).
  9. Farzanegan, A., Pour Mohammad Shahvar, M., Mirzaei-Alawijeh, H., and Mirsanjari, M. (2017) Iran strong motion Network Report 2014, Tehran. Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center, 43 p. (in Persian).
  10. Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S. (2010) Detection of pulse-like ground motions based on continues wavelet Journal of Seismology, 14(4), 715-726.
  11. Iran Strong Motion Network, Housing and Urban Development Research Center. http://www.bhrc. ac.ir
  12. Somerville, P.G. (1998) Development of an improved ground motion representation for near-fault ground motions. of the SMIP 98 Seminar on Utilization of Strong Motion Data, Oakland, CA.
  13. Somerville, P.G., Smith, N.F., Graves, R.W., and Abrahamson, N.A. (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 199-222.
  14. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) (1995) Scenario for a Magnitude 7.0 Earthquake on the Hayward Fault, Chapter 6, 109 p.
  15. Mohammdian, M., Mahdavian, A., and Hassani, N. (2017) A mathematical model to consider the pulse-like earthquake effects in seismic design spectrums based on strong motions of Iran. Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering, 4(4), 89-106 (in Persian).
  16. Mohammdian, M. (2019) Near-Field Ground Motions. Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research Publishing (in Persian).
  17. Maniatakis, Ch.A., Taflampas, I.M., and Spyrakos, C.C. (2008) Identification of near-fault earthquake record characteristics. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
  18. Baker, J.W. (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5), 1486-1501.
  19. Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center (2014) Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Building, Standard No. 2800 (4th Edition). Permanent committee for revising the Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, Tehran (in Persian).
  20. Boore, D.M. and Bommer, J.J. (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25(2), 93-115.
  21. Boore, D.M., Stephens, C.D., and Joyner, W.B. (2002) Comments on baseline correction of digital strong-motion data: examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake. Bulletin of   the Seismological Society of America, 92(4), 1543-1560.
  22. Boore, D.M. (2001) Effects of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Tawian, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(5), 1199-1211.
  23. Bommer, J.J., Stafford, P.J., and Alarcon, J.E. (2009) Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration     of earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99(6), 3217-3233.
  24. Page, R.A., Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., and Coulter, H.W. (1972) Ground Motion Values for Use in the Seismic Design of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System.S. Geological Survey.
  25. Bolt, B.A. (1969) Duration of strong motion. 4th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
  26. Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G. (1975) A Study of the Duration of Strong Earthquake Ground Motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65(3), 581-626.
  27. McCann, M.W. and Shah, H.C. (1979) Deter-mining strong-motion duration of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 69(4), 1253-1265.
  28. Trifunac, M.D. and Westermo, B.D. (1982) Duration of strong earthquake shaking. Inter-national Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1(3), 117-121.
  29. Naeim, F. (2001) The Seismic Design Handbook. 2nd Edition, Springer US, 830 p.
  30. Boore, D.M. and Thompson, E.M. (2014) Path durations for use in the stochastic-method simulation of ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(5), 2541-