Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Structures on Liquefied Soils Improved by Deep Mixing Method with a Grid Pattern

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran
2 M.Sc. Graduate, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The phenomenon of liquefaction can lead to significant damage to various structures, infrastructure, and superstructures situated on loose to medium dense saturated deposits during an earthquake. This occurs when the soil loses its resistance and transitions into a fluid-like state due to increased pore water pressure and decreased effective stress. Therefore, it is crucial to enhance the stability of such ground conditions before commencing any construction activities.
In recent years, the deep soil mixing (DSM) method utilizing a grid (lattice) pattern has emerged as one of the most widely adopted techniques for mitigating the effects of liquefiable soils. This method involves mechanically mixing stabilizing materials, such as cement and lime, with soil using either a dry method (in powder form) or a wet method (in slurry form) using hollow drills and mixing blades, depending on site conditions. This approach generates no vibrations in the soil or neighboring structures. The soil mixing process results in the formation of uniform soil-cement columns. Through the sequential and overlapping implementation of these columns before achieving full resistance, continuous walls and a grid structure are created beneath the ground surface, which are denser than the native soil. Consequently, these structures absorb maximum shear stresses induced by earthquakes, thereby preventing soil particle movement, reducing excess pore water pressure, and mitigating the effects of liquefaction.
Approximately half a century after the development of the DSM technique, its application has been limited in Iran due to technological constraints. The significance of employing this method is highlighted by the presence of coastal regions in both the northern and southern parts of the country. Given Iran's susceptibility to seismic activity and liquefaction in coastal zones, the implementation of deep soil mixing serves to mitigate liquefaction risks and avert associated challenges. However, very limited studies have been conducted on the performance of deep mixing column grid systems in the presence of structures during earthquakes. Most existing research has primarily focused on evaluating the performance of deep mixing grids in dealing with liquefaction without considering structural interactions. Consequently, there are currently no comprehensive guidelines for designing deep mixing columns with a grid pattern for liquefiable soils beneath structures.
This study investigates the most important influential factors in the design of deep mixing grids and their impact on the seismic response of structures situated on them. The research was conducted using Midas GTS NX, a three-dimensional finite element software, and the results were validated against centrifuge test data of Ishii et al. (2017). Liquefiable soil with a modified UBC sand behavioral model and deep mixing soil-cement columns was modeled with an elastic behavioral model. To investigate the seismic vulnerability of the structures, a conventional 10-story steel frame structure was designed and placed on the improved ground and then it was subjected to the Kobe (1995) and Northern California (1954) earthquakes..
The study reveals that increasing the diameter of soil-cement columns, the replacement area ratio, and the number of grids-while simultaneously decreasing grid dimensions-significantly reduces the generation of excess pore water pressure (ru). This reduction is achieved by enhancing the system’s stiffness and minimizing shear stresses. These improvements result in an average 35% in the shear applied to the enclosed, as well as a fourfold decrease in the relative displacement of structural floors compared to unimproved ground conditions due to applied earthquakes.
Finally, the study proposes an optimized triple-grid design with dimensions of 10.7 × 13 meters, a replacement area ratio of 20.1%, and DSM columns with a diameter of 0.9 meters. This configuration has been identified as the most effective solution for mitigating liquefaction effects and reducing the seismic vulnerability of structures.
Keywords

Subjects


Abe, H. (1996). Liquefaction shaking table tests for sandy ground with embankment. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1996(554), 1–17.
Babasaki, R., Suzuki, K., & Suzuki, Y. (1992, July). Centrifuge tests on improved ground for liquefaction. In Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (pp. 1461–1464). Balkema.
Baez, J. I., & Martin, G. R. (1992). Liquefaction observations during installation of stone columns using the vibro replacement technique. Geotechnical News, 10(3), 41–44.
Bradley, B. A., Araki, K., Ishii, T., & Saitoh, K. (2013). Effect of lattice-shaped ground improvement geometry on seismic response of liquefiable soil deposits via 3-D seismic effective stress analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 48, 35–47.
Cao, Y., Kurimoto, Y., Zhou, Y. G., Ishikawa, A., & Chen, Y. (2023). Centrifuge model tests on liquefaction mitigation effect of soil-cement grids under large earthquake loadings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 21(1), 1–20.
DehghanKhalili, H. (2018). Investigating the effect of deep mixing columns on reducing liquefaction complications under surface foundations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Tehran, (in Persian).
Hamada, J., Honda, T., & Nakatsu, N. (2016). Dynamic centrifuge model tests on failure behavior of grid-form DMWs supporting a tall building. Takenaka Technical Research Report, 72, 1–13.
Hazirbaba, K., & Omarow, M. (2019). Strain-based assessment of liquefaction and seismic settlement of saturated sand. Cogent Engineering, 6(1), 1573788.
Ishii, I., Towhata, I., Hiradate, R., Tsukuni, S., Uchida, A., Sawada, S. I., & Yamauchi, T. (2017). Design of grid-wall soil improvement to mitigate soil liquefaction damage in residential areas in Urayasu. Journal of JSCE, 5(1), 27–44.
Kaneda, K., & Hamada, J. (2021). Centrifuge model simulation for seismic behavior of grid-form deep mixing walls supporting a building. In Challenges and Innovations in Geomechanics: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of IACMAG (Vol. 2, pp. 44–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64514-4_5
Kitazume, M. (2009). Twenty-nine years of experience with physical modelling of geotechnical problems in port structures. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 9(3), 1–19.
Kitazume, M., & Takahashi, H. (2010). Centrifuge model tests on effect of deep mixing wall spacing on liquefaction mitigation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering & 5th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering (pp. 473–478). Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education India.
Kuhlemeyer, R. L., & Lysmer, J. (1973). Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 99(5), 421–427.
Li, H., Dong, S., El-Tawil, S., & Kamat, V. R. (2013). Relative displacement sensing techniques for postevent structural damage assessment. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(9), 1421–1434.
Madani, H., & Alielahi, H. (2024). Numerical study of the use of deep mixing method with grid pattern in the improvement of liquefiable soils in order to reduce the seismic response of structures. 9th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (SEE9). Tehran, Iran.
Matsuo, O., Shimazu, T., Goto, Y., Suzuki, Y., Okumura, R., & Kuwabara, M. (1996). Deep mixing method as a liquefaction prevention measure. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Ground Improvement Geosystems (pp. 521–526). Tokyo.
Midas. (2019). GTS NX user manual. MIDAS Information Technology Corporation Ltd.
Ministry of Construction. (1999). Design and construction manual of liquefaction prevention techniques (draft). Joint Research Report.
Mohammadian, M., Edalati, A., Rashidi, S., & Edalati, A. (2018). Evaluation of the design structures spectrum against earthquakes and factors affecting it. Omran Nameh Student Scientific Journal, 1(3), 15–22.
Mori, H., Ogawa, Y., Kusano, K., Okamoto, J., & Abe, H. (2000). Centrifuge dynamic modeling test and two-dimensional liquefaction analysis for huge river dike. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (12WCEE), Paper No. 0476.
Namikawa, T., Koseki, J., & Suzuki, Y. (2007). Finite element analysis of lattice-shaped ground improvement by cement-mixing for liquefaction mitigation. Soils and Foundations, 47(3), 559–576. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.559
Nguyen, T. V., Rayamajhi, D., Boulanger, R. W., Ashford, S. A., Lu, J., Elgamal, A., & Shao, L. (2013). Design of DSM grids for liquefaction remediation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(11), 1923–1933.
O’Rourke, T. D., & Goh, S. H. (1997). Reduction of liquefaction hazards by deep soil mixing. In Post-Earthquake Reconstruction Strategies: NCEER-INCEDE Center-to-Center Project (pp. 87–105).
Porbaha, A. (2000). State of the art in deep mixing technology. Part IV: Design considerations. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement, 4(3), 111–125.
Porbaha, A., Zen, K., & Kobayashi, M. (1999). Deep mixing technology for liquefaction mitigation. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 5(1), 21–34.
Rabeti Moghadam, M., Alielahi, H., & Sadeghi Abdollahi, A. (2017). Numerical evaluation of liquefaction-induced damages in composite breakwaters and its application for performance-based improvement design. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 35(3), 376–396.
Rahmani, A., Fare, O. G., & Pak, A. (2012). Investigation of the influence of permeability coefficient on the numerical modeling of the liquefaction phenomenon. Scientia Iranica, 19(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.010
Rayamajhi, D., Nguyen, T. V., Ashford, S. A., Boulanger, R. W., Lu, J., Elgamal, A., & Shao, L. (2012). Effect of discrete columns on shear stress distribution in liquefiable soil. In GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering (pp. 1908–1917).
Siddharthan, R. V., & Porbaha, A. (2008). Seismic response validation of DM treated liquefiable soils. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, 1–10.
Takahashi, H., Morikawa, Y., Iba, H., Fukada, H., Maruyama, K., & Takehana, K. (2013). Experimental study on lattice-shaped cement treatment method for liquefaction countermeasure. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (pp. 1619–1622).
Topolnicki, M. (2016, February). General overview and advances in deep soil mixing. In XXIV Geotechnical Conference of Torino: Design, Construction and Controls of Soil Improvement Systems (pp. 25–26).
Tsukuni, S., Uchida, A., Honda, T., & Konishi, K. (2014). Dynamic centrifuge model test focused on settlement of the residence improved with grid-form deep mixing walls. Geotechnical Engineering Journal, 9(4), 761–771.
Watanabe, K., Wang, T., Ishikawa, M., Iijima, M., & Mihira, S. (2023). Dynamic behavior of liquefiable ground reinforced by in-situ cement-mixing lattice wall. Soils and Foundations, 63(4), 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101352
Yamashita, K., Hamada, J., Onimaru, S., & Higashino, M. (2012). Seismic behavior of piled raft with ground improvement supporting a base-isolated building on soft ground in Tokyo. Soils and Foundations, 52(5), 1000–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.017

  • Receive Date 17 June 2024
  • Revise Date 24 June 2024
  • Accept Date 02 July 2024