Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering

Proposing a Collection of Selected Accelerometers for Near, Mid and Far Fields across Different Soils, Respecting the Diversity of Different Indexes

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
Abstract
Nowadays, considering the diversity in construction, especially in tall and irregular buildings, the use of time-history analyses has become essential for designers. For this purpose, it is necessary to refer to available accelerogram databases and select those matching the site conditions. Accelerograms from near-field, mid-field, and far-field zones have distinct frequency content. Additionally, site conditions significantly affect the amplitude and period of seismic cycles. Another critical issue is the duration of earthquakes and their varying effects on structures. All accelerograms available in this database, caused by earthquakes with moment magnitudes ranging from 5 to 7.5, were collected and categorized based on distance into three groups: near-field (less than 20 km), mid-field (20 to 50 km), and far-field (more than 50 km). Subsequently, the records were classified according to the shear wave velocity of the site for each accelerogram and the standard soil classifications of the Iranian Standard 2800 code. Given the considerable number of records in various distance-soil type categories, proper selection while observing dispersion criteria is essential.
In this research, efforts were made to select, within each distance category, a representative sample covering all seismic magnitudes from 5 and above. Additionally, an attempt was made to cover the range of shear wave velocity within each category, from its lower to higher values. This process also accounted for variability in both distance and seismic duration. The distribution pattern based on each specified criterion is well illustrated in this study. Moreover, in the classification of accelerograms, factors such as earthquake focal depth were also examined. Focal depth is a key parameter in determining the intensity and distribution of seismic energy, which is evident when comparing the response spectra of accelerograms with the standard spectrum. Although deeper earthquakes typically transmit less energy to the surface, the frequency distribution of this energy can have diverse effects on structures. In this study, various earthquake acceleration records were extracted and analyzed from the database of the Earthquake Engineering Research Center at the University of California. The records were then categorized based on various criteria, including affected zone, magnitude diversity, distance, site soil conditions, and earthquake duration.
The database of this study includes 104 accelerograms for near-field earthquakes, 128 accelerograms for mid-field earthquakes, and 149 accelerograms for far-field earthquakes, whose distributions are presented based on different criteria. The response spectra of the selected accelerograms presented in this research were compared with the standard spectrum of the Iranian Standard 2800 code (fourth edition) for each distance zone and soil type. Some accelerograms showed significantly higher acceleration than Iran’s Standard 2800, while others showed lower values. This variation depends on the seismic potential of the source near the site, evaluated through hazard analysis. Additionally, the impact of the causative fault type and its kinematic characteristics were considered in this comparison.
This study presented the uncorrected accelerograms to provide a clearer representation of actual earthquakes occurring in different zones (near-field, mid-field, and far-field). However, in practice, scaling must be performed for seismic design as per regulations. As the distance from the seismic source increases in mid- and far-field zones, the acceleration reaching the site generally decreases, and the Iranian Standard 2800 acceleration spectrum provides more conservative values.
On the other hand, it was shown that as the soil becomes softer and the average shear wave velocity decreases, there is a risk of spectral acceleration amplification at longer periods. Therefore, specific structures with long dominant periods must undergo detailed time-history analyses using accelerograms corresponding to the relevant distance zones and site conditions to prevent potential damage. Furthermore, it was suggested that supplementary analyses be conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of structures to variations in input parameters.
Finally, the accelerogram tables presented in this study significantly assist structural designers in maintaining the necessary diversity when selecting accelerograms for time-history analyses. This ensures that the designed structure has sufficient resistance against various earthquakes and substantially reduces errors in accelerogram selection. Additionally, this method guarantees enhanced seismic design accuracy and minimizes the likelihood of structural damage caused by different earthquakes.
Keywords

Subjects


American Society of Civil Engineers. (2022, January). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers.
Ashayeri, I., & Nikbakhtan, M. (2016). Presenting relations for generating synthetic accelerograms in Iran Plateau using stochastic approach. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 18(2), 123-134.
Baker, J. W., & Allin Cornell, C. (2006). Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35(9), 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.571
Baker, J. W., Lin, T., Shahi, S. K., & Jayaram, N. (2011). New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research program. PEER report, 3, 2011.
Barjouie Roshan Pour, H. (2024). Relationships for Evaluating the Seismic Resilience Index of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Built Up with FRP Lying on Different Soil Types under Near and Far-Field Earthquakes. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran.
BHRC (2014). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings standard No. 2800. 4th edition, Building & Housing Research Center of Iran, Iran.
Coles, J. F., Riva-Murray, K., Van Metre, P. C., Button, D. T., Bell, A. H., Qi, S., ... & Sheibley, R. W. (2019). Design and methods of the US Geological Survey Northeast Stream Quality Assessment (NESQA), 2016 (No. 2018-1183). US Geological Survey.
European Committee for Standardization. (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2009). FEMA P-695: Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Washington, DC: Author.
Haselton, C. B., Baker, J. W., Bozorgnia, Y., Goulet, C. A., Kalkan, E., Luco, N., ... & Zareian, F. (2009). Evaluation of ground motion selection and modification methods: Predicting median interstory drift response of buildings (PEER Report 2009/01). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Iran Strong Motion Network (ISMN). (n.d.). Road, Housing & Urban Development Research Center. Retrieved from http://smd.bhrc.ac.ir
Katsanos, E. I., & Sextos, A. G. (2018). Structure-specific selection of earthquake ground motions for the reliable design and assessment of structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16, 583–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0227-2
Katsanos, E. I., Sextos, A. G., & Manolis, G. D. (2010). Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(4), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005
Kottke, A. and Rathje E. M. (2008). A semi-automated procedure for selecting and scaling recorded earthquake motions for dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 24(4), 911-932.
Kwong, N. S., & Chopra, A. K. (2018). Determining bidirectional ground motions for nonlinear response history analysis of buildings at far-field sites. Earthquake Spectra, 34(4), 1931–1954. https://doi.org/10.1193/061117EQS113M
Lee, L. H., Lee, H. H., & Han, S. W. (2000). Method of selecting design earthquake ground motions for tall buildings. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 9(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(200009)9:3<201::AID-TAL145>3.0.CO;2-1
Li, C., Zhai, C., Kunnath, S., & Ji, D. (2019). Methodology for selection of the most damaging ground motions for nuclear power plant structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.016
Mohraz, B. (1992). Recent studies of earthquake ground motion and amplification. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 6695–6704.
Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R. (2007). Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(12), 1710–1718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1710)
Palanci, M., Kayhan, A. H., & Demir, A. (2018). A statistical assessment on global drift ratio demands of mid-rise RC buildings using code-compatible real ground motion records. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(11), 5453–5488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0386-9
Stewart, J. P., Chiou, S. J., Bray, J. D., Graves, R. W., Somerville, P. G., & Abrahamson, N. A. (2002). Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9–12), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00081-X
Tahmasebi, A., & Rahimi, M. (2021, December). Evaluation of nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of steel braced frame buildings subjected to near-field earthquakes using FBD and DBD. Structures, 34, 1364–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.090
Tian, L., Ma, R., & Qu, B. (2018). Influence of different criteria for selecting ground motions compatible with IEEE 693 required response spectrum on seismic performance assessment of electricity transmission towers. Engineering Structures, 156, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.052
University of California, Berkeley, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). (n.d.). NGA-West2 ground motion database. Retrieved from https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu
Yahyaabadi, A., & Tehranizadeh, M. (2011). New scalar intensity measure for near-fault ground motions based on the optimal combination of spectral responses. Scientia Iranica, 18(6), 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.09.012
Zafarani, H., & Soghrat, M. R. (2017). A selected dataset of the Iranian strong motion records. Natural Hazards, 86, 1307–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2737-7
Zafarani, H., & Soghrat, M. R. (2024). An empirical spectral ground-motion model for Iran using truncated Iranian strong-motion database enriched by near-field records. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 28(4), 922–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2120545
Zhai, C., Chang, Z., Li, S., & Xie, L. (2013). Selection of the most unfavorable real ground motions for low- and mid-rise RC frame structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 17(8), 1233–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.814090

  • Receive Date 30 June 2024
  • Revise Date 09 July 2024
  • Accept Date 14 July 2024