ارزیابی رفتار دینامیکی ماسه‌های کربناتی

نوع مقاله : Articles

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشکده مهندسی ژئوتکنیک، پژوهشگاه بین المللی زلزله شناسی و مهندسی زلزله

2 گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه شهرکرد

چکیده

ارزیابی دقیق منحنی­های رفتار دینامیکی خاک­ها از مراحل مهم و اساسی در حل مسائل ژئوتکنیک لرزه‌ای از جمله تحلیل پاسخ زمین می­باشند. مطالعات بسیاری جهت ارزیابی این منحنی­ها که شامل منحنی‌های سختی برشی و نسبت میرایی هستند، صورت گرفته است. اکثر این مطالعات بر روی خاک­های سیلیکاتی انجام پذیرفته است. مطالعات زمین­شناسی حاکی از آن است که بخش وسیعی از سطح زمین در نواحی گرمسیری از جمله نواحی جنوبی کشور ایران پوشیده از خاک­های کربناتی است. از این‌رو بررسی رفتار خاک­های کربناتی تحت بارهای دینامیکی از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است. در این مقاله مطالعات تحلیلی، تجربی و آماری انجام شده بر روی منحنی­های رفتار دینامیکی خاک­ها بررسی و اثر پارامترهای مختلف بر این منحنی­ها شرح داده می­شود. در ادامه مطالعات آزمایشگاهی چرخه­ای و دینامیکی انجام شده در فشارهای محدودکننده‌ی میانگین 40، 200 و 400 کیلو پاسکال و دانسیته­ی نسبی 50 و 80 درصد بر روی ماسه کربناتی بوشهر گزارش می­شوند. در نهایت پارامترهای دینامیکی حاصل از آزمون‌های آزمایشگاهی این تحقیق با مطالعات گذشته مقایسه شد که نتایج حاصل نشان از تفاوت رفتاری ماسه­ی کربناتی بوشهر با الگوهای مبتنی بر ماسه­های سیلیکاتی داشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Dynamic Behavior of Calcareous Sands

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yaser Jafarian 1
  • Hamed Javdanian 2
1 International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Iran
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Shahrekord University
چکیده [English]

Reliable and accurate assessment of dynamic soil behavior curves is necessary for the solution of many soil dynamic problems, such as the site response analysis. The shear modulus and damping curves of silicate soils under different conditions have been investigated by many geotechnical researchers.
Carbonate sediments are located in temperate and tropical areas and cover approximately 40% of the ocean surface. This type of soil is typically observed near offshore hydrocarbon industries, such as the Persian Gulf. Carbonate sand is the accumulation of pieces of carbonate materials; it usually originates from reworked shell fragments and skeletal debris of marine organism. Foundation problems associated with carbonate soil deposits, particularly as experienced by the offshore hydrocarbon industry have led to significant research focused on understanding the behavior of these soils.
This study focuses on evaluation of dynamic properties of Bushehr calcareous sand. The shear modulus and damping ratio of the tested sand was measured at small to large shear strains using resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests. The calcareous sand specimens were tested by a fixed-free type of resonant column apparatus (SEIKEN model). By using the resonant column apparatus, shear modulus and damping ratio of the calcareous sand for the shear strain amplitude ranging from about 10-4 % to 10-2 % were measured. The cyclic triaxial tests were conducted using a fully automated GDS triaxial testing apparatus. The cyclic tests were done on samples with shear strain amplitudes ranging from about 10-2 % to 1 %. The procedure used to perform the dynamic and cyclic tests was the multi-stage strain-controlled loading under undrained condition.
The tests were conducted in three levels of initial effective mean confining pressure equal to 40, 200, and 400 kPa. The sand specimens were constructed in relative densities lower than 50 or 80 percent, depends on the initial effective stress, in order to acquire the target relative densities (i.e. 50 or 80 percent) after consolidation.
The experimental results indicate that with an increased shear strain amplitude, shear modulus decreases and damping ratio increases. This trend, which was observed for all the tests, is typical behavior of soils under dynamic loading, as observed in the previous studies.
The effect of mean effective confining pressure and relative density on the normalized shear modulus (G/Gmax) curves of the Bushehr calcareous sand was investigated. Gmax is the small-strain shear modulus measured at shear strain amplitude about 10-4 %. The increase in mean effective confining pressure causes the normalized shear modulus to increase; however, it is more pronounced in low effective confining pressure. Changes of the normalized shear modulus curves (G/Gmax-γ) at the range of σ'm=200-400 kPa is less than that at the range of σ'm=40-200 kPa. Normalized shear modulus curves are almost independent of the changes in relative density of the sand.
The results also indicate that the increased amount of initial mean effective confining pressure leads to the smaller damping ratio for the tested sand. It is also observed that damping ratio curves (D-γ) are not affected strongly by relative density changes.
Comparison of the tests results with the ranges and models recommended by the previous researchers reveals that the normalized shear modulus and damping ratios of the studied calcareous sand are somewhat inconsistent. In fact, there might be a necessity to modify the previous recommendations for accurate prediction of the dynamic behavior curves of calcareous sands.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Shear modulus
  • Damping Ratio
  • Carbonate Sand
  • Silicate Sand
  1. Kramer, S.L. (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Delhi (India): Pearson Education Ptd. Ltd. [Reprinted 2003].
  2. Ishihara, K. (1996) Soil Behavior in Earthquake Geotechnics. Oxford Science Publications, 350 p.
  3. Senetakis, K., Anastasiadis, A., Pitilakis, K., and Coop, M.R. (2013) The dynamics of a pumice granular soil in dry state under isotropic resonant column testing. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 45, 70-79.
  4. Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka F., and Takagi, Y. (1978) Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils and Foundations, 18, 39-56.
  5. Kokusho, T. (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils and Foundations, 20, 45-60.
  6. Kokusho, T., Yoshida, Y., and Esashi, Y. (1982) Dynamic soil properties of soft clay for wide strain range. Soils and Foundations, 22, 1-18.
  7. Sun, J.I., Golesorkhi, R., and Seed, H.B. (1988) Dynamic Moduli and Damping Ratios for Cohesive Soils. Report, UCB/EERC-88/15, University of California at Berkeley, 48 p.
  8. Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R. (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117, 89-107.
  9. Idriss, I.M. (1990) Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes. Proceedings, H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symposium, 2, 273-289.
  10. Kim, Y.S., Ha, T.G., Choi, J.J., and Chung, C.K. (2007) The influence of dynamic properties of ground soil on vibration characteristics of rigid body on sand ground. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 11, 81-91.
  11. Iwasaki, I. and Tatsuoka, F. (1977) Effects of grain size and grading on dynamic shear modulus of sands. Soils and Foundations, 38, 19-35.
  12. Rollins, K.M., Evans, M.D., Diehl, N.B., and Daily, W.D. (1998) Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels. Journal of geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124, 396-405.
  13. Ishibashi, I. and Zhang, X. (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils and Foundations, 33, 182-191.
  14. Brennan, A.J., Thusyanthan, N.I., and Madabhushi, S.P.G. (2005) Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131, 1488-1497.
  15. Hardin, B.O. and Drnevich, V.P. (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, 98, 667-692.
  16. Li, Z., Escoffier, S., and Kotronis, P. (2013) Using centrifuge tests data to identify the dynamic soil properties: Application to Fontainebleau sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 52, 77-87.
  17. Oztoprak, S. and Bolton, M.D. (2013) Stiffness of sands through a laboratory test database. Geotechnique, 63, 54-70.
  18. Vardanega, P.J., Bolton, M.D. (2013) Stiffness of clays and silts: normalizing shear modulus and shear strain. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139, 1575-1589.
  19. Jafarian, Y., Haddad, A. and Javdanian, H. (2014) Predictive model for normalized shear modulus of cohesive soils. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 11, 89-100.
  20. Javdanian, H., Jafarian, Y., and Haddad, A. (2015) Predicting damping ratio of fine-grained soils using soft computing methodology. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8, 3959-3969.
  21. Javdanian, H., Haddad, A., and Jafarian, Y. (2015) Evaluation of dynamic behavior of fine-grained soils using group method of data handling. Transportation Infrastructure Engineering, 1(3), 77-92.
  22. Senetakis, K., Anastasiadis, A. and Pitilakis, K. (2012) The small-strain shear modulus and damping ratio of quartz and volcanic sands. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 35, 964-980.
  23. Holmes, A. (1978) Principles of Physical Geology. Sunbury-on-Thames, Nelson, London, 730 p.
  24. Coop, M.R. and Airey, D.W. (2003) ‘Carbonate sands.’ In: Characterization and engineering properties of natural soils, Tan, T.S., Phoon, K.K., Hight, D.W., and Leroueil, S. (eds), 1049-1086.
  25. Coop, M.R., Sorensen, K.K., Freitas, T.B., and Georgoutsos, G. (2004) Particle breakage during shearing of a carbonate sand. Geotechnique, 54, 157-163.
  26. Sharma, S.S. and Fahey, M. (2004) Deformation characteristics of two cemented calcareous soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41, 1139-1151.
  27. Lenart, S. (2006) Deformation characteristics of lacustrine carbonate silt in the Julian Alps. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26, 131-142.
  28. Brandes, H.G. (2011) Simple shear behavior of calcareous and quartz sands. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 29, 113-126.
  29. Jewell, R.J. (1993) An Introduction to Calcareous Sediments. Research Report No. G1075, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Western Australia, 45 p.
  30. Hassanlourad, M., Salehzadeh, H., and Shahnazari, H. (2008) Dilation and particle breakage effects on the shear strength of calcareous sands based on energy aspects. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 6, 108-119.
  31. Hassanlourad, M., Salehzadeh, H., and Shahnazari, H. (2011) Undrained triaxial shear behavior of grouted carbonate sands. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 9, 307-314.
  32. Dehnavi, Y., Shahnazari, H., Salehzadeh, H., and Rezvani, R. (2010) Compressibility and undrained behavior of Hormuz calcareous sand. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15, 1684-1702.
  33. Shahnazari, H. and Rezvani, R. (2013) Effective parameters for the particle breakage of calcareous sands: An experimental study. Engineering Geology, 159, 98-105.
  34. Shahnazari, H., Salehzadeh, H., Rezvani, R., and Dehnavi, Y. (2014) The effect of shape and stiffness of originally different marine soil grains on their contractive and dilative behavior. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18, 975-983.
  35. Jafarian, Y., Haddad, A., and Javdanian, H. (2016) Estimating the shearing modulus of Boushehr calcareous sand using resonant column and cyclic triaxial experiments. Modares Civil Engineering Journal, 15(4), 9-19 (in Persian).
  36. Jafarian, Y., Haddad, A., and Javdanian, H. (2015) Comparing the shear stiffness of calcareous and silicate sands under dynamic and cyclic straining. 7th International Conference of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (SEE7), 18 May, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
  37. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1970) Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analyses. Report No. EERC-70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
  38. Seed, H.B., Wong, R.T., Idriss, I.M. and Tokimatsu, K. (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 112, 1016-1032