بررسی رفتار لرزه‌ای تونل مترو دایروی در ماسه خشک توسط آزمایش‌های میز لرزه

نوع مقاله : Articles

نویسندگان

دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

یک سری آزمایش‌های میز لرزه g1 برای بررسی پاسخ مدل تونل متروی تبریز که یک تونل دایروی مدفون در ماسه خشک می‌باشد، تحت بارگذاری نامنظم با دامنه کم و امواج هارمونیک با دامنه بالا انجام شد. اثرات پارامترهای مختلف شامل شتاب ماکزیمم زمین و محتوای فرکانسی حرکات ورودی روی رفتار تونل بررسی شد. آزمایش‌ها در دو شتاب ماکزیمم زلزله g0.35 و g0.50 و فرکانس‌های 1، 3، 5 و 8 هرتز انجام شدند. نتایج آزمایش‌ها برحسب نیروهای دینامیکی پوشش تونل و شتاب نقاط مختلف مدل ارائه شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد رفتار دینامیکی تونل‌های دایروی می‌تواند به دو مرحله تقسیم‌بندی شود: مرحله ناپایدار در طی چندین سیکل اول و مرحله سیکل‌های پایدار که در طی آن نیروها در پوشش تونل حول مقدار میانگین نوسان می‌کند. به‌علاوه، اندازه‌گیری‌های آزمایش‌های میز لرزه نشان می‌دهد با افزایش فرکانس بارگذاری برای شتاب A=0.35g، لنگر ماکزیمم ایجاد شده در پوشش تونل ثابت مانده یا اندکی کاهش می‌یابد اما برای A=0.50g، لنگر ماکزیمم به‌شدت کاهش می‌یابد. شتاب افقی ثبت شده در چندین تراز نشان می‌دهد که تقویت سطحی به‌وسیله حفره تونل انجام می‌گیرد که به‌عنوان مانع در جهت گسترش امواج برشی به سمت بالا عمل می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Experimental Study of the Seismic Response of Tabriz Subway Tunnel in Dry Sand

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Farrin
  • Masoud Hajialilue-Bonab
Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

A series of 1 g shaking table tests were performed to investigate the response of Tabriz subway tunnel, a circle-type tunnel embedded in dry sand, under sinusoidal excitations. In prototype, the subway tunnel with 9.2 m diameter and 0.35 m thickness was embedded in a soil layer. Two reduced-scale 1 g shaking table models, designated as FF and SF, were constructed in 1/45 scale. The FF was constructed to study the seismic response of the soil layer in free field condition, while the SF model includes a subway tunnel to study its seismic response during different excitations.
The shaking table of Tabriz University with a platform of 3m×2m and one-degree of freedom was used to induce the desired excitations to models. The table can carry up to 6 tones and can reach acceleration levels up to 1.5 g with peak displacements of ±100 mm. A laminar shear box was designed in Tabriz University that includes 20 aluminum frames with dimensions of 1320×814×860 mm (L×H×W). In order to reduce the friction between the layers and simulate the displacement of soil layers, ball bearings were used between two adjacent frames. In this box type, the lateral boundary effect on the seismic response of the soil layer is reduced.
The simulation laws for 1 g shaking table tests were utilized in the current study. Based on the simulation laws and the size of the laminar shear box, the prototype to model scale factor was considered to be 45. Therefore, the tunnel model was constructed by aluminum alloy with a diameter of 195.5 mm and thickness of 1.5 mm.
Uniform dry sand provided from Qomtapeh was used in this study. During the construction, the tunnel and all the embedded instruments were placed in the model. To avoid any interaction of the tunnel with the laminar shear box, the tunnel was selected shorter than the box width. Two PVC circular plates were placed at both the tunnel ends to avoid the sand entrance into the tunnel model. To simulate the effects of friction on the soil–tunnel interaction, the outside surface of tunnel was covered by sand particles using epoxy coating. For reaching the same target relative density (Dr=65%) during the construction of models, the bulk unit weight was controlled to be constant for all layers. Seven strain gauges were installed on the tunnel surface to monitor the behavior of the tunnel. Five accelerometers were placed in different levels of the model to record the acceleration in the soil. Besides, two LVDTs were placed on the top of the model to measure the soil surface settlement. A 32-channel dynamic data logger was used to record and transfer all the measured data to a personal computer.
Two types of excitation were applied to the models by shaking table: I) irregular waves with high frequency content and low amplitude to determine the natural frequency of the models, and II) harmonic waves with low frequency content and high amplitude to study the seismic response of the tunnel. Two peak ground accelerations of 0.35 g and 0.50 g with frequencies of 1, 3, 5 and 8 were applied to the models at this stage.
The recorded data highlighted significant aspects of the dynamic response for the above type of underground structures:
- The results show that the ground response of the free field model is different from the tunnel-soil model and the natural frequency of the free field is slightly larger than soil-tunnel model. This indicates the effect of the tunnel on the applied frequency to the system.
- The recorded horizontal accelerations at different levels indicate that accelerations are amplified towards the soil surface and the tunnel acts as an obstacle against the propagation of shear waves upward.
- According to the results, the dynamic response of circular tunnels can be split into two stages: transient stage and steady-state cycles. During the transient stage, which lasts for the first few cycles, the tunnel reaches a dynamic equilibrium configuration. The transient stage is followed by the steady-state cycles, during which the forces in the tunnel lining oscillate around a mean value.
- For all tests, bending moments and lining deformations increase by increasing in maximum base acceleration, but the location of the highest and the lowest amounts stays the same.
- According to the results, for A=0.35 g, maximum bending moment is constant or reduces a little by increasing frequency; however, for A=0.50 g, maximum bending moment reduces sharply by increasing of the loading frequency.
The results show that in the earthquakes with high PGA, the dynamic bending moments caused in the tunnel lining are larger than cracking moment that can lead to a serious damage to the lining in combination with other loads.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Subway Tunnel
  • Tabriz city
  • Physical Modeling
  • Shaking Table
  • Seismic Response
  1. Hashash, Y.M.A., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B., and Yao, J.I-C. (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Journal of Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 16, 247-293.
  2. Onoue, A., Kazama, H., Hotta, H., Kimura, T., and Takemura, J. (1994) Behaviour of stacked-drift-type tunnels. Proceedings of the International Conference Centrifuge 94, Defense Technical Information Center, Singapore, Malaysia, 1, 687-692.
  3. Yamada, T., Nagatani, H., Igarashi, H., and Takahashi, A. (2002) Centrifuge Model Tests on Circular and Rectangular Tunnels Subjected to Large Earthquake-Induced Deformation. Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Toulouse, France, 1, 673-678.
  4. Cilingir, U. and Madabhushi, S.P.G. (2011a) Effect of Depth on the Seismic Response of Circular Tunnels. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(1), 117-127.
  5. Cilingir, U. and Madabhushi, S. P. G. (2011b) A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behavior of tunnels. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31, 452-462.
  6. Yang, D., Naesgaard, E., Byrne, P.M., Adalier, K., and Abdoun, T. (2004) Numerical model verification and calibration of George Massey tunnel using centrifuge models. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41, 921-942.
  7. Cao, J. and Huang, M.S. (2010) Centrifuge Tests on the Seismic Behavior of a Tunnel, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. 7th ICPMG, Zurich, Switzerland, 1, 537-542.
  8. Lanzano, G., Bilotta, E., Russo, G., Silvestri, F., and Madabhushi, S.P.G. (2012) Centrifuge modelling of seismic loading on tunnels in sand. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 35(6), 854-869.
  9. Luzhen, J., Jun, Ch., Jie, L. (2010) Seismic response of underground utility tunnels: shaking table testing and FEM analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Vibration, 9(4), 555-567.
  10. Tsinidis, G., Pitilakis, K., Heron, Ch., Madabhushi, G. (2013) Experimental and numerical investigation of the seismic behavior of rectangular tunnels in soft soils. 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Kos Island, Greece.
  11. Baziar, M.H., Ghalandarzadeh, A., and Rabeti Moghadam, M. (2015) Tehran subway tunnel effect on the seismic response of the ground surface with linear soil behavior: an experimental and numerical study. Journal of Science and Earthquake Engineering, 2(3), 15-36 (in Persian).
  12. Katebi, H., Rezaei, A.H., Hajialilue-Bonab, M., Tarifard, A. (2015) Assessment the influence of ground stratification, tunnel and surface buildings specifications on shield tunnel lining loads (by FEM). Journal of Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 49, 67-78.
  13. Iai, S. (1989) Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1g gravitational field.
  14. Soils Foundations, 29(1), 105-118.
  15. Guglielmetti, V., Grasso, P., Mahtab, A., Xu, S. (2007) Mechanized Tunneling in Urban Areas: Design Methodology and Construction Control. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.
  16. Koyama, Y. (2003) Present status and technology of shield tunneling method in Japan. Journal of Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 18, 145-159.
  17. Kramer, S.L. (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
  18. ACI (2015) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI 318M-14. American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318.